Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:42:13.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining the Theory and Practice of Peace and Conflict Studies through an Experiential Conflict Analysis Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2021

Amanda Blewitt Open the ORCID record for Amanda Blewitt [Opens in a new window] ,
Christine Choi Open the ORCID record for Christine Choi [Opens in a new window]  and
Elisabeth King Open the ORCID record for Elisabeth King [Opens in a new window]
Amanda Blewitt
Affiliation:
New York University
Christine Choi
Affiliation:
Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack
Elisabeth King
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can political science classes best prepare undergraduate students for the field of peace and conflict studies (PACS)? We argue that well-designed experiential learning activities provide opportunities for students to embrace complexity and practice adaptability, fusing the theoretical and practical in ways that prepare them to engage in PACS. This article presents one such experiential learning approach: a conflict analysis activity. Through engaging in a messy learning process, students (1) gain an increased theoretical understanding of the complexity of conflict, (2) practice adaptability, and (3) increase their self-efficacy. We provide a step-by-step description of the Conflict Analysis Tool exercise and reflect on how well the activity enables the use of knowledge and skills relevant for PACS. Our goal is that the insights gained through our approach will be helpful to other educators—from PACS to international relations to American politics and beyond.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 744 - 749
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asal, Victor, and Blake, Elizabeth L.. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160500484119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, Sin, Steve S., Fahrenkopf, Nolan P., and She, Xiaoye. 2014. “The Comparative Politics Game Show: Using Games to Teach Comparative Politics Theories.” International Studies Perspectives 15:347–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, L. Jeffrey, and Meizlish, Deborah S.. 2003. “Becoming Congress: A Longitudinal Study of the Civic Engagement Implications of a Classroom Simulation.” Simulation & Gaming 34 (2): 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103034002003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael E. 1996. The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Elisabeth. 2010. “We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Powerpoint” New York Times, April 27. www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html.Google Scholar
Carstarphen, Nike, Zeiler, Craig, Harris, Robert, and Smith, David J.. 2010. “Graduate Education and Professional Practice in International Peace and Conflict.” Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Special Report 246. www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr246.pdf.Google Scholar
Centellas, Miguel, and Love, Gregory J.. 2012. ““We’re Off to Replace the Wizard”: Lessons from a Collaborative Group Project Assignment.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 506–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000388.Google Scholar
Coffey, Daniel, Miller, William, and Feuerstein, Derek. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects Through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7:14–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2011.539906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Peter. 2012. “Introductory Course on Dynamical Systems Theory and Intractable Conflict.” www.beyondintractability.org/cic_documents/dsap/coleman-intro-course.pdf.Google Scholar
Dicklitch, Susan. 2003. “Real Service=Real Learning: Making Political Science Relevant Through Service-Learning.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (4): 773–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503003111.Google Scholar
Graf, Wilfried, Kramer, Gudrun, and Nicolescou, Augustin. 2007. “Counseling and Training for Conflict Transformation and Peace Building.” In Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, ed. Webel, Charles and Galtung, Johan, 123–42. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grummel, John. 2003. “Using Simulation to Teach Decision Making within the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (4): 787–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503003147.Google Scholar
Harris, Mark Jonathan, and Sanin, Oles (directors). 2017. Breaking Point: The War for Democracy in Ukraine. United States.Google Scholar
Harris, Sidney. 2020. Science Cartoons Plus, S . Harris Cartoon Gallery. www.sciencecartoonsplus.com/pages/gallery.php.Google Scholar
Hertel, P. John, and Millis, Barbara J.. 2002. Using Simulations to Promote Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction. Dulles, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
Lay, J. Celeste, and Smarick, Kathleen J.. 2006. “Simulating a Senate Office: The Impact on Student Knowledge and Attitudes.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (2): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160600668967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederach, John P. 2005. The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2019. “Complementarity and Interdisciplinarity in Peace and Conflict Studies.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (2): 267–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariani, Mack, and Glenn, Brian J.. 2014. “Simulations Build Efficacy: Empirical Results from a Four-Week Congressional Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (3): 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2014.921623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matyók, Thomas. 2011. “Peace and Conflict Studies: Reclaiming Our Roots and Designing Our Way Forward.” In Critical Issues in Peace and Conflict Studies: Theory, Practice, and Pedagogy, ed. Matyók, Thomas, Senehi, Jessica, and Byme, Sean, 293–310. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McBride, Becca. 2017. “Teaching Across Cultures: Student-Led Modules in a Human Rights Course.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (4): 1089–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001263.Google Scholar
Rinfret, Sara. 2017. “Experiential Learning and Pathways to Carbon Neutrality.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 842–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000701.Google Scholar
Ross, Marc Howard. 2007. Cultural Contestation in Ethnic Conflict . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David. 1961. “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14 (1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiss Agency for Development. 2005. “Conflict Analysis Tools.” www.files.ethz.ch/isn/15416/CSPM%20Tipp%20Conflict%206.3.pdf.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zwick, Edward (director). 2006. Blood Diamond. Santa Monica, CA: Bedford Falls Production.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Blewitt et al. supplementary material

Blewitt et al. supplementary material

Download Blewitt et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 89.8 KB