Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T07:40:53.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can the Rational Choice Framework Cope with Culture?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ian Shapiro
Ian Shapiro*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Editor's Note: This essay is drawn from a 1997 APSA Annual Meeting roundtable entitled “Can the Rational Choice Framework Cope with Culture?” It was presented by the Comparative Politics Division, chaired by Nancy Bermeo of Princeton University, and included, in addition to Ian Shapiro, Robert H. Bates of Harvard University, Ronald Inglehart of the University of Michigan, and Ian Lustick of the University of Pennsylvania.

I do not believe it is fruitful to try to answer the question, “Can the rational choice framework cope with culture?” Asking it implies that the rational choice approach founders due to its inattention to cultural variables, and (depending on how dire one takes the diagnosis to be), that this defect would be remedied if the rational choice framework was replaced, modified, or supplemented by what might be thought of as a “culturalist” one. Consider each of these prescriptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 1: 30th Anniversary Issue , March 1998 , pp. 40 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chong, Dennis. 1996. “Rational Choice Theory's Mysterious Rivals.” In The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered, ed. Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dernier, Daniel. 1996. “Rational Choice and the Role of Theory in Political Science.” In The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered, ed. Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1991. “Rationality and Interpretation: Parliamentary Elections in Early Stuart England.” In The Economic Approach to Politics, ed. Monroe, Kristen. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Shapiro, Ian. 1996. “Pathologies Revisited: Reflections on Our Critics.” In The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered, ed. Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Courtney. 1997. “The Myth of the Divided Society.” Yale University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Jung, Courtney, and Shapiro, Ian. 1995. “South Africa's Negotiated Transition: Democracy, Opposition, and the New Constitutional Order.” Politics and Society 23: 269–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62:25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1996. Democracy's Place. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, and Jung, Courtney. 1996. “South African Democracy Revisited: A Reply to Koelble and Reynolds.” Politics and Society 24:237–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar