Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-qdp55 Total loading time: 0.22 Render date: 2021-12-04T03:40:17.010Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Intersectionality and Voting Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Celeste Montoya*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder

Extract

One hundred years after ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, the ability of women to effectively exercise the right to vote is far from guaranteed. Although 1920 may mark the historical moment when women’s suffrage was added to the Constitution, the past century has been rife with obstacles preventing many women, particularly women of color, from exercising their right to vote. Scholars have noted that for these women, the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965 was pivotal in more fully securing the right to vote (Hewitt 2010; Junn and Brown 2008; Montoya 2018; Smooth 2006). With a resurgence in voter-suppression efforts and a US Supreme Court ruling that weakened the VRA, voting rights again are imperiled. Although the role of race and class justifiably have been placed at the center of analysis, little attention has been given to the potential gendered considerations. This article argues that gender is still a salient part of the story, and intersectional analysis is necessary for a more thorough understanding of the impact that restrictive laws might have in order to counter them.

Type
Symposium: Women's Political Involvement in the 100 Years since the Nineteenth Amendment
Copyright
© American Political Science Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barreto, Matt A., Frasure-Yokley, Lorrie, Vargas, Edward D., and Wong, Janelle. 2018. “Best Practices in Collecting Data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White Respondents: Evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 6 (1): 171–80.10.1080/21565503.2017.1419433Google Scholar
Bejarano, Christina. 2013. The Latino Gender Gap in US Politics. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203744437Google Scholar
Brennan Center for Justice. 2006. “Citizens without Proof: A Survey of Americans’ Possession of Documentary Proof of Citizenship and Photo Identification.” New York: New York University School of Law. Available at www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/download_file_39242.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. “Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (4): 315–48.10.1080/1554477X.2014.955406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1993. “Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection.” Race, Sex & Class 1 (1): 2545.Google Scholar
Eckhouse, Laurel. 2018. “White Riot: Race, Institutions, and the 2016 U.S. Election.” Politics, Groups, and Identities. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1442725.Google Scholar
Fraga, Bernard. 2018. The Turnout Gap: Race, Ethnicity, and Political Inequality in a Diversifying America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108566483Google Scholar
García Bedolla, Lisa. 2007. “Intersections of Inequality: Understanding Marginalization and Privilege in the Post–Civil Rights Era.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 232–48.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 6379.10.1017/S1537592707070065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Jody L., and Taylor, N. T. Brown. 2018. “Impact of Strict Voter ID Laws on Transgender Voters in 2018 General Election.” UCLA School of Law: The William Institute. Available at https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/voter-id-laws-2018.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Nancy A. 2010. “From Seneca Falls to Suffrage? Reimagining a ‘Master’ Narrative of U.S. Women’s History.” In No Permanent Waves: Recasting Histories of U.S. Feminists, ed. Hewitt, Nancy A., 1538. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.10.36019/9780813549170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2016. “The Differential Effect of Resources on Political Participation across Gender and Racial Groups.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, ed. Brown, Nadia E. and Gershon, Sarah A., 1328. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Junn, Jane, and Brown, Nadia. 2008. “What Revolution? Incorporating Intersectionality in Women and Politics.” In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa, 6478. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790621.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junn, Jane, and Masuoka, Natalie. 2019. “The Gender Gap Is a Race Gap: Women Voters in US Presidential Elections.” Perspectives on Politics. Accessed January 17, 2020. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003876.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. Philadelphia: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Mike, Forest, Benjamin, and Öhberg, Patrik. 2020. “The Case for Non-Binary Gender Questions in Surveys.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (1): 128–35.Google Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2016. “Race, Poverty, and the Redistribution of Voting Rights.” Poverty and Public Policy 8 (2): 106–28.10.1002/pop4.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, Celeste. 2018. “From Seneca to Shelby: Intersectionality and Women’s Voting Rights.” In 100 Years of the Nineteenth Amendment: An Appraisal of Women’s Political Activism, ed. McCammon, Holly J. and Bansazak, Lee Ann, 105–27. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2018. “An Examination of the 2016 Electorate, Based on Validated Voters.” Available at www.people-press.org/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics and Gender 2 (3): 400414.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy. 2018. “African American Women and Electoral Politics: The Core of the American Electorate.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L., 171–97. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108277792.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Tova Andera. 2012. The Politics of Voter Suppression: Defending and Expanding Americans’ Right to Vote. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801450853.001.0001Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Montoya supplementary material

Appendix A and B

Download Montoya supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 68 KB
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Intersectionality and Voting Rights
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Intersectionality and Voting Rights
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Intersectionality and Voting Rights
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *