Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:51:44.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural comparisons of TIM barrel proteins suggest functional and evolutionary relationships between β-galactosidase and other glycohydrolases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

DOUGLAS H. JUERS
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
REUBEN E. HUBER
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 Permanent address: Division of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
BRIAN W. MATTHEWS
Affiliation:
Institute of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
Get access

Abstract

β-Galactosidase (lacZ) from Escherichia coli is a 464 kDa homotetramer. Each subunit consists of five domains, the third being an α/β barrel that contains most of the active site residues. A comparison is made between each of the domains and a large set of proteins representative of all structures from the protein data bank. Many structures include an α/β barrel. Those that are most similar to the α/β barrel of E. coli β-galactosidase have similar catalytic residues and belong to the so-called “4/7 superfamily” of glycosyl hydrolases. The structure comparison suggests that β-amylase should also be included in this family. Of three structure comparison methods tested, the “ProSup” procedure of Zu-Kang and Sippl and the “Superimpose” procedure of Diederichs were slightly superior in discriminating the members of this superfamily, although all procedures were very powerful in identifying related protein structures. Domains 1, 2, and 4 of E. coli β-galactosidase have topologies related to “jelly-roll barrels” and “immunoglobulin constant” domains. This fold also occurs in the cellulose binding domains (CBDs) of a number of glycosyl hydrolases. The fold of domain 1 of E. coli β-galactosidase is closely related to some CBDs, and the domain contributes to substrate binding, but in a manner unrelated to cellulose binding by the CBDs. This is typical of domains 1, 2, 4, and 5, which appear to have been recruited to play roles in β-galactosidase that are unrelated to the functions that such domains provide in other contexts. It is proposed that β-galactosidase arose from a prototypical single domain α/β barrel with an extended active site cleft. The subsequent incorporation of elements from other domains could then have reduced the size of the active site from a cleft to a pocket to better hydrolyze the disaccharide lactose and, at the same time, to facilitate the production of inducer, allolactose.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Protein Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)