Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:28:32.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Questioning the Future: Polling Americans at the Turn of the New Millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Get access

Extract

Elected in 1996 to serve as President into a new century, Bill Clinton announced a national mood of expectation in his second inaugural address: “It is our great good fortune that time and chance have put us not only at the edge of a new century, in a new millennium, but on the edge of a bright new prospect in human affairs — a moment that will define our course, and our character, for decades to come.” It was a moment, in short, when Americans, used to thinking ahead, were asked intensely about the future. Known for his close attention to polling data in policy making, Clinton responded to a frequently reported categorization of Americans during the 1990s as self-absorbed. Clinton's homespun message in his second inaugural address called on Americans planning their individual destinies to think collectively when he said simply, “[T]he future is up to us.” As the year 2000 approached, American polls repeatedly measured the national “mood” in light of individual beliefs about the future. Gallup, Torrance, Zogby, CNN (Cable News Network), USA Today, ABC News, and the Pew Research Center, among others, polled Americans about their feelings for the impending millennium “event” and their hopes and fears for the next year, generation, and century. Based on the experience of the last turn of the century, many publishers, educators, and politicians encouraged reflections on the century just past as much as the era ahead, but it was a rare poll that actually asked Americans about their view of the past. To be sure, authorities were queried for the greatest events, presidents, books, films, and television shows of the last century, but it was as much a sign of the difference in their historical perspective from the man or woman on the street as it was some national reflective urge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adams, Henry. The Education of Henry Adams. 1918; rept. New York: Modern Library, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Frederick E.Back to the Future: Beyond the Myth of Ever-Faster High- Tech Change and Radical New Breaks from the Past.” American Heritage 51 (0506 2000): 1820.Google Scholar
Bronner, Simon J.The American Concept of Tradition: Folklore in the Discourse of Traditional Values.” Western Folklore 59 (2000): 87104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronner, Simon J.Folk Nation: Folklore in the Creation of American Tradition. Wilmington, Del.: SR, 2002.Google Scholar
Bronner, Simon J.Following Tradition: Folklore in the Discourse of American Culture. Logan: Utah State University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronner, Simon J.Grasping Things: Folk Material Culture and Mass Society in America. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986.Google Scholar
Cooper, Richard N., and Layard, Richard, eds. What the Future Holds: Insights from Social Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corn, Joseph J., and Horrigan, Brian. Yesterday's Tomorrows: Past Visions of the American Future. 1984; rept. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cornell University, International Students and Scholars Office. “What is a US American? Part One” (http://www.isso.cornell.edu/students/usl.html), updated February 8, 2001, copyright 19952001.Google Scholar
Crèvecoeur, Hector St. John de. Letters from an American Farmer. 1782; rept. New York: Dutton, 1971.Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan. “Folk Ideas as Units of World View.” Toward New Perspectives in Folklore. Ed. Paredes, Américo and Bauman, Richard. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1972: 93103.Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan. “Thinking Ahead: A Folkloristic Reflection of the Future Orientation in American Worldview.” Anthropological Quarterly 42 (1969): 5372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James. Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Pantheon, 1999.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L.The Future as History: The Historic Currents of Our Time and the Direction in Which They Are Taking America. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. “The Agrarian Myth.” Myth America: A Historical Anthology. Ed. Gerster, Patrick and Cords, Nicholas. St. James, N.Y.: Brandywine, 1997: 1621.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Florence Rockwood. “Dominant and Variant Value Orientations.” Personality in Nature, Society and Culture. Ed. Kluckhohn, Clyde, Murray, Henry A., and Schneider, David M.. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953: 342–57.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. “The Study of National Character.” The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Ed. Lerner, Daniel. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951: 7085.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center, “Americans Look to the 21st Century.” Millennium Survey 1999. http://208.240.91.18/mill2rpt.htm.Google Scholar
Pinsker, Sanford. “Henry Adams and Our New Century.” Partisan Review 62 (Spring 2000): 270–81.Google Scholar
Potter, David M.People of Plenty: Economic Abundance and the American Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, Roy, and Thelen, David. The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. The Frontier in American History. 1920; rept. New York: Dover, 1996.Google Scholar
Vogt, Evon Z.Modern Homesteaders: The Life of a Twentieth-Century Frontier Community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robin M. Jr, American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1952.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Michael. “The Presence of the Present, the End of History.” Public Historian 22 (2000): 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar