Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T04:16:26.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lost and Found: The Imagined Geographies of American Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Cindi Katz
Get access

Extract

In the days after September 11th, 2001, and continuing until now, the national guard and other military personnel fanned out around New York City. Automatic rifles slung over their camouflaged shoulders, they “guarded” New York City's transportation stations, vital corners and thoroughfares, marquee buildings, and each and every bridge and tunnel entrance. Their comportment was usually cordial and rarely vigilant. Exuding the antithesis of an urban sensibility, they complemented the beefy boredom of the police who usually stood nearby, with an almost surreal sense of incredulity; not just “Why am I here?” but a sort of bafflement that anyone would even think they knew how to get to an uptown train. I've grown accustomed to their presence — frighteningly so — but still can't get over their costumes. Green, woodsy camouflage. To blend with Penn Station?!

There is of course an exacting science (and art) of camouflage that involves close study of particular landscapes and the production of patterns that will fade into them so that they may be inhabited by stealth. The U.S. military has dozens of camouflage variants for all manner of apparel, equipment, vessels, and vehicles. But in New York City the military dresses not like bricks or pizza or granite, but in forest and jungle and sometimes Desert Storm fatigues. I walk around wondering why.

In the security state authorized and reinforced (but not ushered in) by September 11th, there has been an explosion of surveillance cameras and other mechanisms of vigilance in and around New York City.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prospects , Volume 30 , October 2005 , pp. 17 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smith, Neil, American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

2. Harvey, David, The New Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

3. Katz, Cindi, “Vagabond Capitalism and the Necessity of Social Reproduction,” Antipode 33 (2001): 709–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Katz, Cindi, “Hiding the Target: Social Reproduction in the Privatized Urban Environment,” in Postmodern Geography: Theory and Praxis, ed. Minca, Claudio (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 93–110Google Scholar.

4. Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996)Google Scholar; and Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

5. Smith, Neil, “Contours of a Spatialized Politics: Homeless Vehicles and the Production of Geographic Scale,” Social Text 33 (1992): 54–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Marston, Sallie A., “The Social Production of Scale,” Progress in Human Geography 24 (2000): 19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Katz, , “Vagabond Capitalism.”Google Scholar

7 Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar; Katz, Cindi, “On the Grounds of Globalization: A Topography for Feminist Political Engagement,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26 (2001): 1213–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and Katz, Cindi, Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children's Everyday Lives (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

8. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph, “Theorizing a Global Perspective: A Conversation with Michel-Rolph Trouillot,” Crosscurrents in Culture, Power, and History: A Newsletter of the Institute for Global Studies in Culture, Power, and History, Johns Hopkins University 4 (1996): 1–4Google Scholar; see also Dematteis, Giuseppe “Shifting Cities,” in Minca, , Postmodern Geography, 113–28Google Scholar.

9. Katz, , “On the Grounds”Google Scholar; Katz, , “Vagabond Capitalism”Google Scholar; and Katz, , Growing Up GlobalGoogle Scholar.

10. In topographic maps contour lines connect places of the same elevation, thereby mapping the gradient of slopes so that the three-dimensional form of the landscape can be seen. Producing contour lines does not require every millimeter of the terrain to be measured but rather relies on the precise assessment of elevation at selected sites in order to infer the relationships between them. So too with countertopographies, which I view as a means to draw out precise analytic relationships among places that may appear quite different on the surface.