^{page 285 note 1} Forly Year' Researches, p. 388 (with plans) ; cf. Yorks. Arch, and Topog. Soc., ii. 69–81.

^{page 286 note 1} Dalton's Byzantine Art and Archaeology, p. 602.

^{page 286 note 2} Made for me by Miss E. Lynch, Miss V. Andrews, and Miss G. Sharp, students of the Royal College of Art.

^{page 287 note 1} Cabrol's Diet. s.v. ‘Berlin’, p. 783.

^{page 289 note 1} Cf. Strzygovvski, Orient oder Rom.

^{page 290 note 1} See Cabrol's Dict. s. v. Antinoë; and the ivory box in the British Museum with the story of St. Menas.

^{page 291 note 1} Notice the ear-rings of these angels, which seem to be a characteristic of Coptic art.

^{page 293 note 1} See Mr. Dalton's note in Proceedings, vol. xxii, p. 215.

^{page 293 note 2} The right-hand border is not in its proper place, the piece was continued further to the right; notice the half-fish against the right border.

^{page 293 note 3} See Dalton, Byzantine Art.

^{page 293 note 4} s. v. Ame.

^{page 293 note 5} Cf. the silver ‘shield’ in Venturis vol. i, fig. 436, which should also be Alexandrian.

^{page 293 note 6} See Pératé's Arch.Chrét., fig. 158.

^{page 294 note 1} See Diehl's Manuel, p. 67, and notice the jewelled tlirone.

^{page 294 note 2} See also Strzygowski's catalogue of Coptic objects-m the Cairo Museum.

^{page 294 note 3} See Strzygowski's Der Dom zu Aachen, fig. 8 ; also figs. 9 and 10.

^{page 295 note 1} In view of a question raised in the discussion I may say that the tablet is recessed at the back like the consular diptychs.

^{page 296 note 1} Byzanthie Art and Archaeology.

^{page 296 note 2} Ibid., figs. 117, 129.

^{page 296 note 3} Proceedings, xxiii. 328.

^{page 297 note 1} See Cabrol's Dict. s. v. ‘Cerf’.