Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T22:15:30.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXIV.—The Theory of Bigradients in the Historical Order of Development up to 1860

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

As we have already pointed out (Hist., i. p. 487), bigradients were first brought to light by Sylvester in 1840 in the paper in which he made known his so-called “dialytic“ method of eliminating the unknown from two equations of the same or different degrees. Shortly afterwards Richelot and Cauchy recalled attention to Euler's and Bezout's method of 1764, as giving substantially the same result as Sylvester's, the fact being that the determinant obtained by Sylvester differs from that obtainable in the other case merely by being its conjugate. The details of these papers and of others related to them have already been given.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 396 note * Crelle's Journ., xxvii, pp. 105–106, 319–321.

page 397 note * This short paper of Cayley's teems with misprints, both in the original and in the Collected Math. Papers.

page 399 note * The signs require verification.

page 401 note * This identity Heilerman published again separately in 1860 (see Zeitschrift f. Math. u. Phys., v. pp. 262–263). It is included, however, in a result given by Stern in 1883 (see Grelle's Journ., x. p. 156); and a still more general identity will be found in the Proc. Edin. Math. Soc., xxiii, p. 37.

page 401 note † The expression for R4,4 is full of inaccuracies.

page 402 note * Three misprints being corrected.

page 403 note * In the expression for R4,4 there is at least one misprint, namely, a 2 c 2 for a 2 b 2 outside the third square of the chain.

page 406 note * The expression for R4,4 though now given more accurately than before, is still disfigured by at least ten misprints.