Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T02:25:13.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X.—The Anatomy of the Polychæte Ophelia cluthensis McGuire 1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Robert S. Brown
Robert S. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow
Get access

Extract

Ophelia cluthensis is a Polychæte worm which has been known for some years from specimens taken from the sands around Millport, and particularly from Kames Bay. It was described for the first time by McGuire in 1935, and its general appearance may be seen in the Plate, figs. A, B.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , 1939 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Ashworth, J. H., 1901. “The Anatomy of Scalibregma inflatum Rathke,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. xlv, N.S., pp. 237–309, pls. xiii‐xv, figs. 1–30.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. H., 1904. “Arenicola,” Liverpool Mar. Biol. Mem., vol. xi, London.Google Scholar
Benham, W. B., 1901. The Cambridge Natural History, London, vol. ii, p. 275.Google Scholar
Bullot, G., 1904. “Artificial Parthenogenesis and Regular Segmentation in an Annelid,” Arch. Entw. Mech. Org., vol. xviii, pp. 161–170, 13 figs.Google Scholar
Claparède, Éd., 1868. “Les Annélides Chétopodes du Golfe de Naples,” Genève et Bale, pp. 282–294, pl. xxvi, figs. 1–1H, and pl. xxix, figs. 1–1C.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1925. “Sur les Ophéliens des Côtes de France,” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., vol. 1, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1927. Faune de France—Polychètes Sédentaires, Paris, pp. 128–139, figs. 46–48.Google Scholar
Kükenthal, W., 1887. “Ueber das Nervensystem der Opheliaceen,” Jena. Zeits. Naturw., vol. xx, pp. 511–580, pls. xxxii-xxxiv.Google Scholar
McGuire, I. P., 1935. “Note on a New Species of Polychæte (Ophelia cluthensis),” Scot. Nat., March‐April, 1935, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C., 1915. British Marine Annelids, Ray Society, vol. iii, pp. 1–30, and plates.Google Scholar
Pruvot, G., 1885. “Récherches Anatomiques et Morphologiques sur le Système Nerveux des Annélides Polychètes,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., 2e serie, vol. iii, pp. 308–312, pl. xv, figs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
de Quatrefages, A., 1865. Histoire Naturelle des Annelés, Paris, vol. ii, pt. 1, pp. 269–280.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1930. “Salinity Interchange between Sea‐water in Sand and Overflowing Fresh‐water at Low Tide,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., vol. xvi, pp. 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saint-Joseph, , 1898. “Les Annélides Polychètes des Côtes de France,” Ann. Sci. nat. Zool., ser. 8, vol. v, pp. 369–381, pls. xxi‐xxii, figs. 181, 199.Google Scholar
Schaeppi, Th., 1894. “Das chloragogen von Ophelia radiata” Jena. Zeits. Naturw., vol. xxviii, pp. 247–293, pls. xvi‐xix, figs. 1–39.Google Scholar
Wohlenberg, E., 1937. “Die Wattenmeer‐Lebensgemeinschaften im Königshafen von Sylt,” Helgol. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., vol. i, pt. 1, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar