Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:18:43.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—The Association of Non‐homologous Chromosomes in Corixidæ (Hemiptera‐Heteroptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

H. D. Slack
H. D. Slack
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow. Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access

Extract

Karyological studies on spermatogenesis in species of aquatic bugs of the family Corixidæ have brought to light several examples of an unusual type of chromosome behaviour during the course of meiosis. It is considered to be an association of non‐homologues in a manner unexampled in other animal species.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , 1939 , pp. 192 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bauer, H., 1936. “Structure and Arrangement of Salivary Gland Chromosomes in Drosophila Species,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. xxii (4), pp. 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1923. “On the Nature of the Centrosomal Force,” Journ. Genetics, vol. xiii, pp. 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, H. I., 1933. “Chromosome Studies in Stauroderus,” Journ. Morph., vol. lv, pp. 3I3–347.Google Scholar
Corey, H. I., 1937. “Heteropycnotic Elements of Orthopteran Chromosomes,” Arch. Biol. Paris, vol. xlix, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar
Darlington, C. D., 1936. “Crossing‐over and its Mechanical Relationships in Chorthippus and Stauroderus,” Journ. Genetics, vol. xxxiii, pp. 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, C. D., 1937. Recent Advances in Cytology, 2nd ed., London, p. 498.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1934. Grundriss der Cytologie, Berlin, p. 149.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M., 1933. Allgemeine Biologie, 2nd ed., Jena, p. 71.Google Scholar
Janssens, F. A., 1924. “La chyasmatypie dans les insectes,” La Cellule, vol. xxxiv, pp. 180–213.Google Scholar
Koller, P. C., 1935. “Internal Mechanics of the Chromosomes. IV. Pairing and Coiling in Salivary Gland Nuclei of Drosophila,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxviii, pp. 371–397.Google Scholar
Kostoff, D., and Arutinian, N., 1938 a. “Heterochromatic (Inert) Regions in the Chromosomes of Crepis capillaris,” Nature, vol. cxli (3568), p. 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostoff, D., 1938 b. “Heterochromatin at the Distal Ends of Chromosomes in Triticum monococcum,” Nature, vol. cxli (3572), p. 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwada, Y., 1929. “Chromosome Arrangement. 1. Model Experiments with Floating Magnets and some Theoretical Considerations on the Problems,” Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto, vol. iv, pp. 199–264.Google Scholar
Longley, A. E., 1937. “Morphological Characters of Teosinte Chromosomes,” Journ. Agric. Res., vol. liv, pp. 835–862.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. S., 1905. “On Conditions determining the Disposition of the Chromatic Filaments and Chromosomes in Mitosis,” Biol. Bull., vol. viii, pp. 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, B., 1933. “The Association of Non‐homologous Parts of Chromosomes in Mid‐prophase of Meiosis of Zea mays,” Zeits. Zellforsch., vol. xix, pp. 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, B., 1934. “Relation of a Particular Chromosome Element to the Development of Nucleoli in Zea mays,” Zeits. Zellforsch., vol. xxi, pp. 294–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, C. W., 1916. “Chromosome Studies on the Diptera. II. The Paired Association of the Chromosomes in the Diptera and its Significance,” Zeits. Exp. Zool., vol. xxi, pp. 213–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffet, A. A., 1936. “The Origin and Behaviour of Chiasmata. XIII. Diploid and Tetraploid Culex pipiens,” Cytologia, vol. vii, pp. 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterffi, T., 1924. Handb. Biol. Arbeitsmethoden Hrg. u. Abderhalden, vol. v (2), pp. 479–561.Google Scholar
Pinney, E., 1908. “Organisation of the Chromosomes in Phrynotettix magnus,” Kansas Univ. Sci. Bull., vol. iv, pp. 307–316.Google Scholar
Prokofieva, A., 1931. “Spermatogenese bei Corixa distincta,” Arch. Anat. Hist. Embryol. Russe, vol. x (1), pp. 64–79.Google Scholar
Prokofieva, A., 1933. “Vergleichend‐karyologische Studien von elf Arten der Familie Corixidæ (Hemiptera‐Heteroptera),” Zeits. Zellforsch., vol. xix (1), p. 3.Google Scholar
Prokofieva‐Belogovskaya, A., 1935. “Structure of the Chromocentre,” Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., vol. ii (7), pp. 498–499.Google Scholar
Stern, C., 1931. “Zytologische‐genetische Untersuchungen als Beweise für die Morganische Theorie der Factorenaustauche,” Biol. Zbl., vol. li, pp. 547–587.Google Scholar
Taylor, M., 1914. “The Chromosome Complex of Culex,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Soc., vol. lx, pp. 377–398.Google Scholar
Wenrich, D. H., 1916. “The Spermatogenesis of Phrynotettix magnus, with Special Reference to Synapsis and the Individuality of the Chromosomes,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. lx (3), pp. 57–133.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B., 1928. The Cell in Development and Heredity, 3rd ed., New York, pp. 538, 542.Google Scholar