Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:23:57.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Reflexion-Caustics of Symmetrical Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

The caustics here considered are those resulting from the reflexion of systems of parallel rays. The subject is purely geometrical. The caustic is considered as a derived curve, and is denned as the envelope of a system of lines drawn from the primary curve, whose inclination to a given line is double the inclination of the normal at the incident point.

It is comparatively easy to find an expression for a caustic in mixed cöordinates. But, where the cöordinates of the primary curve have to be eliminated, the problem becomes more difficult, and unless this condition be fulfilled the expression cannot be considered a true analytical solution of the locus. In the present paper, differential and algebraic expressions are first found containing the cöordinates of the focal point corresponding to a point in the primary or reflecting curve, and the cöordinates of the latter are then eliminated between the differential and algebraic equations.

Type
Proceedings 1889-90
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1891

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

note * page 288 The change of the reference line does not affect the value of R, because the coefficient, sin (ω - ν) is a function of the difference of two angles.

note * page 290 SC is the reflected ray produced to C′ in the opposite direction. The proof is the same as in CASE 1, as far as Equation (7), if we substitute SC′ for SC, Then taking SC ═ SC′, C is a point on the caustic. It is now evident that the curve should have been treated as a convex reflector. C′ is a point on the true caustic, if the direction of the incident ray be reversed.

note * page 292 The proof probably admits of extension to the form rn = an cos mθ. Cos pθ, but this has not been completely investigated.