Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:22:17.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—Experiments and Observations on Crustacea: Part IV. Some Structural Features Pertaining to Glyptonotus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

John Tait
John Tait
Affiliation:
Scottish Oceanographical Laboratory and Physiological Laboratory of Edinburgh University
Get access

Summary

1. Advantage has been taken of the large size of Glyptonotus to study certain structural features, especially skeletal, which cannot be so readily investigated in smaller isopods. Where possible, an attempt has been made to correlate structural peculiarities with functional use.

2. The Legs.—The peculiar articulation, analogous to a spheroidal bony joint, between the coxopodites and basipodites of the thoracic limbs, is described in detail. A comparison is instituted between the full flexion-complex of the isopodan and of the brachyuran walking limb. The peræopods are contrasted with the gnathopods of Glyptonotus, and functional peculiarities pertaining to each group of limbs are discussed.

3. The Peræon.—The medial split in the thoracic sternites is interpreted as a device for allowing of distension of the body, say, after a meal. The arched thoracic somites articulate with each other in a special way, not by a crossed articulation, like that in a pair of scissors, but by a rocker articulation, like that in a spring clothes-pin; this combination of arch and rocker articulation is interpreted as a means of preventing change of internal volume in body flexion. The phenomena pertaining to the moulting process throw light upon the numerical grouping of the successive fusions of coxæ with somites which have occurred in isopods.

4. The Pleon.—The pleon consists of four movable portions, the last four of the seven constituent pieces being welded together. Of the four fused segments, only the first has a complete sternite, like those of somites 1, 2, and 3. In the skeleton of the pleonic floor a wide opening is thus left posteriorly, which is closed by a diaphragm of soft cuticle; part of this diaphragm is elevated into two long parallel folds or valves, one on each side of the anus.

5. The Pleonic Appendages.—The protopodite of each of the anterior three pleopods is composed of two complete pieces; a third piece more proximally situated is interpreted, not as evidence of an additional primitive segment, but as a secondary development in the articular membrane. The uropods have acquired their present position by a forward rotation of the sternite of the sixth primitive somite, and the gill-directed surface of the uropod corresponds to the posterior surface of the pleopods. It follows that what has commonly been called the exopodite of the uropod is a real exopodite. In addition to the pleopods, the internal walls of the whole uropodal chamber subserve a respiratory function.

6. The Cephalosome.—Two thoracic somites are fused with the head to form a cephalosome. By welded inturnings of the anterior border of these two and of the posterior border of the mandibular cephalic somite a strong internal bracing is formed. The tergites of the maxillary somites have apparently disappeared from the dorsal aspect of the cephalon; the endo-skeletal structures described by Lloyd in Bathynomus, and by him named “sternal alæ,” functionally correspond to these tergites in so far as they serve for attachment of muscles for the maxillæ. These “sternal alæ” (which also appear to form a covering for the maxillary excretory gland) with other ventral endoskeletal structures are described in detail. All are rigidly fixed to the maxillo-sternal framework, which is capable of independent movement.

7. The Alimentary Canal.—The foregut of Glyptonotus is not a gastric mill; the muscle-provided involutions of its wall (exactly analogous to those in Bathynomus) are concerned simply with onward propulsion of the food, i.e. with swallowing. Between the midgut and the hindgut, the two opposed ends of which are not in exact alignment, is a strongly contractile part of the gut, which acts as a sphincter. The hepatic cæca could not be examined. Glyptonotus is carnivorous.

8. The Eyes and the Chromatophore-System.—By experiment on colour change of Idotea it has been shown that the eye of this animal acts as a double mechanism, the ventral half being functionally separable from the dorsal. Glyptonotus has retractile chromatophores, and probably undergoes colour change in accordance with différent modes of eye illumination. Its eye is divided into two entirely separate parts, one lying on the dorsal the other on the ventral aspect of the cephalon.

The cost of providing the illustrations which accompany this paper was defrayed by a grant from the Earl of Moray Endowment for the promotion of research in the University of Edinburgh; and the expense of preparing the blocks was defrayed by a grant from the Carnegie Trust.

I have to record my thanks to Dr W. S. Bruce, not only for the material provided, but for information relating to the quarters inhabited by Glyptonotus.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 37 , 1918 , pp. 246 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGBAPHY

Bauer, V., Centralb. f. Physiol., 1905, vol. xix, pp. 453–462.Google Scholar
Bethe, A., Arch. f. miler. Anat., 1897, vol. 1, pp. 460–546, esp. p. 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calman, W. T., “Crustacea,” pt. vii, fase. 3 of Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, London, 1909.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M., Scient. Monthly, 1916, vol. ii, pp. 189–202.Google Scholar
Collinge, W. E., Jour. Zool. Research, 1916, vol. i, pp. 86–88.Google Scholar
Doflein, F., Festschr. z. 60ten Geburtstag Richard Hertwigs, 1910, vol. iii, pp. 215–292, esp. pp. 283, 285.Google Scholar
Eights, J., Trans. Albany Inst., Albany, 1833, vol. ii, pp. 53–57, 331–334. (Ref. from Richardson, p. 191.)Google Scholar
Eights, J., Amer Jour. of Sc. and Arts, 2nd ser., 1853, vol. xv, p. 135. The same résumé is also contained in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 1853, vol. xi, pp. 339–340.Google Scholar
Eights, J., Amer. Jour. of Sc. and Arts, 2nd ser., 1856, vol. xxii, pp. 391–397.Google Scholar
Flower, W. H., The Hone, London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trabner & Co., 1891, pp. 162–164.Google Scholar
Gerstaecker, A., “Crustacea,” Bronn's Tierreich, 1881, vol. v, Abt. 2, pl. iv, fig. 13.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J., Dijmphna-Toytets zoologisk-botaniske Udbytte, 1887, pp. 188–195, pl. xx.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J., Zool. Ariz., 1893, vol. xvi, pp. 193–198, 201–212. Eng. trans. of this paper in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 6th ser., 1893, vol. xii, pp. 417–434.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J., Jour. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., 1903, vol. xxix, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
Helland-Hansen, B., “Physical Oceanography,” chap. v of Murray, and Hjort's, The Depths of the Ocean, London, Macmillan, 1912, pp. 248–253.Google Scholar
Hodgson, T. V., Crustacea, ix, “Isopoda,” Nat. Antarct. Expedition: Nat. Hist., 1910, vol. v, pp. 45–49, pi. vii.Google Scholar
Lloyd, R. E., Mein. Ind. Mus., 1908, vol. i, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J., Jour. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., 1883, vol. xvi, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
Miller, F. R., Jour. Physiol., 1910, vol. xl, pp. 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne Edwards, A., and Bouvier, E. L., “Les Bathynomes,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. at Harvard College, 1902, vol. xxvii, pp. 128–175.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jos., “Cancer,” L.M.B.C. Memoirs, 1908, p. 86, pi. iv, fig. 35.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, G., Jahrb. d. Hamburg. wiss. Anstalten, 1887, vol. iv, pp. 115–125.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, G., Die internat. Polarforschung, 1882–1883: die deutschen Expeditionen, 1890, vol. ii, pp. 455–574, esp. pp. 505, 506.Google Scholar
Pieron, H., Bull. Sc. France-Belgique, Paris, 7th ser., 1914, vol. xlviii, pp. 30–79. (Ref. from Zool. Record, 1914.)Google Scholar
Racovitza, E. G., and Sevastos, E., Arch. Zool. exp. et gén., 5th ser., 1910, vol. vi, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harriet, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1904, vol. xxvii, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harriet, “Isopods of North America,” Bull. No. 54, U.S. Nat. Mus., 1905, pp. 346–407; also p. 133.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harriet, “Crustacés, Isopodes,” Expédition Antarctique Française, 1903–1905, 1907, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harriet, “Crustacés, Isopodes,” Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française, 1908–1910, 1913, p. 17.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S., Form and Function: a Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology, London, Murray, 1916, 383 pages.Google Scholar
Stubbing, T. R. R., A History of Crustacea, Internat. Sc. Series, London, 1893, p. 343.Google Scholar
Tait, J., Quart. Jour. Exper. Physiol., 1908, vol. i, pp. 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, J., (A) Quart. Jour. Exper. Physiol., 1910, vol. iii, pp. 1–20. (B) Proc. Physiol. Soc., pp. xl, xli. Jour. Physiol., 1910, vol. xl.Google Scholar
Tait, J., Jour. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 1911, vol. ix, p. 192.Google Scholar
Tait, J., Part I of this series, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1917, vol. xxxvii, pp. 50–58; Part II,Google Scholar
Tait, J., Part I of this series, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1917, vol. xxxvii, pp. 59–68, Part III,Google Scholar
Tait, J., Part I of this series, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1917, vol. xxxvii, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. Von, Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere, Berlin, Springer, 1909, 259 pages.Google Scholar