Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:22:39.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4. Algebra of Relationship. Part III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

§ 1. In my previous papers on this subject I used the relationship terms, not in a representative but in a class sense; for instance, cA was employed to denote the children of the man A, and U was employed to denote the total assemblage of mankind, or a limited portion of that assemblage. I have found it useful for the purpose on hand to analyse these symbols into their component elements. Let U denote a man representatively, that is, any man, then mankind is appropriately represented by ΣU, where Σ has its ordinary mathematical meaning of taking the sum. Also UA is the appropriate mathematical expression for the man who has the name A, and A standing by itself is to be regarded as a contraction for UA. This notation is useful where, as in the present case, the universe of the investigation is composed of individuals; but since the universe may be continuous in its nature, by taking U to denote the whole, a more general basis is given to the Algebra of Logic, and accordingly I adopted that notation in my work on the subject.

Type
Proceedings 1880-81
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1882

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 162 note * Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., vol. x. p. 224, and vol. xi. p. 5.