Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:31:55.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1. The Historic Evidence for the Destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

It will conduce to clearness if, before making any remarks, I take the liberty of reproducing the title of this address in a slightly enlarged form. In order to convey a precise idea of my object, it will be desirable to frame it thus:—

“On the Evidence (prior to the Excavations commenced in A.D. 1755) for the Destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum by the Eruption of Vesuvius in A.D. 79.”

It will be seen from this way of putting the case, that I propose to confine my attention to documentary evidence. The reference to Vesuvius is also important, because it might conceivably be maintained, and indeed it has been maintained within the present century, that these cities were destroyed by other agencies, and not by the outburst of the neighbouring volcano.

Type
Proceedings 1881-82
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1882

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 425 note * Jamque et flere pio Vesuvina incendia cantu Mens erat.—Statius, Silvæ, lib. v. carm. iii. 205, 6.

page 425 note † The illiterate often wrote Bia Noba for Via Nova. We usually speak of Sebastopol; our regiments have, I believe, Sevastopol.

page 425 note ‡ In a note to Melmoth's translation of Pliny's Letters.

page 426 note * For the references to De Maistre and Neander, I am indebted to the above-mentioned work of Archbishop Trench.

page 428 note * Dean Merivale calls attention to the other allusions made by Statius to a subject “peculiarly interesting to him as a native of Neapolis.” They also occur in the Sylvæ (lib. v. carm. iii. 305; lib. iv. carm. viii. 4). In the last named passage the poet congratulates Julius Menecrates on the birth of a third child:—

“clari genus ecce Menecratis auget Tertia jam soboles: procerum tibi nobile vulgus Crescit, et insani solatur damna Vesevi.

page 430 note * It is true that Plutarch introduces an objector, but the tendency of the treatise appears to me to be unmistakably in the direction of belief in the Sibylline predictions.

page 430 note † “For a beautiful thought in the last chapter but one of The Old Curiosity Shop, I am indebted to Mr Rogers. It is taken from his charming tale Ginevra.

“And long might'st thou have seen An old man wandering as in quest of something— Something he could not find–he knew not what.”

Charles Dickens, Preface to Barnaby Rudge, in Master Humphrey's Clock, vol. iii, (ed. 1841).

page 434 note * It seems right to give the original. “Quamvis enim pulcherrimarum clade terrarum, ut populi, ut urbes memorabili casû, quasi semper victurus occiderit; quamvis ipse plurima opera et mansura condiderit, multum tamen perpetuitati ejus scriptorum tuorum æternitas addet.” Mr Lewis's version is substantially identical with that given above; that of Melmoth is too much of a paraphrase to be cited in evidence. Professor Sellar has observed, I should think with perfect justice, that the Latinity of this silver age had certainly lost much of the precision which characterised the writers of the Augustan epoch.

page 437 note * Lewis would extend this term beyond Polybius. I should be inclined to go as far as thirty-five years.

page 439 note * Lectures on Modern History, lect. viii.

page 442 note * Πόσαι δὶ πόλεις ὅλαι, ἵν, οὕτως εἴπω, τεθνήκασιν, Ελικκη κκαι Πομπήϊοι καὶ Ηρκλάνον, κααὶ ἄλλαι ἀναρίθμητόι—Marci Antonini Commentariorum, lib. iv. cap. 48.