Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:45:09.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XVII.—Inheritance of Resistance to Blight (Phytophthora infestans) in Potatoes: Inter-Relationships of Genes and Strains*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

William Black
Affiliation:
Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Corstorphine, Edinburgh.
Get access

Synopsis

The common strain and six specialised strains of Phytophthora infestans have been employed in testing potato varieties and seedling progenies bred from the wild species S. demissum for resistance to the disease. Resistance, due to the hypersensitive condition of the protoplasm, is manifested in the presence of major genes, and four such genes have been identified, viz. R1, R2, R3 and R4. Each gene induces in the plant a hypersensitive response to infection with the common strain and with a particular group of specialised strains of the parasite. The genes are inherited independently in simple Mendelian fashion, but in the segregations three different types of deviations from standard disomic ratios occur due to (a) unpaired chromosomes, (b) incompatibility factors, and (c) partial autosyndesis. A series of minor genes modify the phenotypic expression of the major gene system and so differentiate grades of hypersensitivity or of susceptibility as the case may be.

The common strain of P. infestans appears to be a population persisting at an equilibrium determined by host range and environmental conditions. Mutations frequently occur, but new forms survive only when host genotypes, to which they are specially adapted, are available.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Becker, C. L., 1939. “Inheritance Studies in the Interspecific Cross Solanum demissum Lindl. × S. tuberosum L.”, Journ. Agric. Res., LIX, 2339.Google Scholar
Black, W., 1943. “Inheritance of Resistance to Two Strains of Blight (Phytophthora infestans de Bary) in Potatoes”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., LXI, 137147.Google Scholar
Black, W., 1945. “Inheritance of Resistance to Blight (Phytophthora infestans) in Potatoes: Unbalanced Segregations”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, LXII, 171181.Google Scholar
Black, W., 1949. “Inheritance of Resistance to Blight (Phytophthora infestans) in Potatoes: Comparison of A and B Strains”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, LXIII, 290301.Google Scholar
Black, W., 1950. “Inheritance of Resistance to Blight (Phytophthora infestans) in Potatoes: Strain C and its Relationships”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, LXIV, 216228.Google Scholar
Bonde, R., Stevenson, F. J., and Clark, C. F., 1940. “Resistance of Certain Potato Varieties and Seedling Progenies to Late Blight in the Tubers”, Phytopath., xxx, 733748.Google Scholar
Bruyn, H. L. De, 1943. “Method voor het vastellen van de vatbaarheidsgrad van aardappelknollen voor de aardappelziekte”, Tydschr. Pl. Ziekten, XLIX, 7799.Google Scholar
Bruyn, H. L. De, 1947. “Het Rassenprobleem Bij Phytophthora infestans”, Vakbl. Biol., XXVII, 147152.Google Scholar
Clinton, G. P., 1911. “Oospores of Potato Blight”, Rept. Conn. Agric. Expt. Sta., 753774.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H., 1941. “Untersuchungen über die Genetik und Physiologie der Resistenz der Kartoffel gegen Phytophthora infestans de Bary. Die genetische Analyse der Resistenz von Solanum demissum sp. (vorl. Mitteilung)”, Züchter, XIII, 3334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaldo, A., and Akeley, R. V., 1946. “Herencia de la reaction a la Phytophthora infestans en la Papa”, Agricultura Tecnica (Santiago-Chile), VI, 1241.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., 1930. “Ueber die Phytophthoraresistenz der Kartoffel und ihre Vererbung (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der Polyploidie bei der Kartoffel)”, Angew. Bot., XII, 299324.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., 1941. “Physiologisch-genetisch Untersuchungen zur Analyse der Phytophthora-Resistenz der Kartoffel”, Proc. VIIth Int. Genet. Congr., Edinburgh, 1939, 222223.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., 1950. “Affinity and Reactivity of Angiosperms to Phytophthora infestans”, Nature, London, CLXVI, 392395.Google Scholar
Muller, K. O., and Behr, L., 1949. “‘Mechanism’ of Phytophthora Resistance of Potatoes”, Nature, London, CLXIII, 498499.Google Scholar
Muller, K. O., and Boerger, H., 1941. “Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Phytophthora-Resistenz der Kartoffelzugleich ein Beitrag zum Problem der ‘erworbenen Resistenz’ im Pflanzenreich”, Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Land.-u.-Forstw., Berlin, XXIII, 189231.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., Meyer, G., and Klinkowski, M., 1939. “Physiologisch-Genetische Untersuchungen über die Resistenz der Kartoffel gegenüber Phytophthora infestans”, Naturwiss., XXVII, 765768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petterson, M. L. R., 1941. “Xeromorphy and its Bearing on Disease Resistance in Plants”, Abstr. Diss. University, Cambridge, 1920.Google Scholar
Reddick, D., 1940. “Problems in Breeding for Disease Resistance”, Chron. Bot., VI, 7377.Google Scholar
Reddick, D., and Mills, W., 1938. “Building up Virulence in Phytophthora infestans”, Amer. Potato Journ., xv, 2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaman, R. N., 1928. “Abnormal Segregation in Families arising from the Cross Solanum utile × Solanum tuberosum (with a Cytological Analysis by Mary Adams)”, Verhand. Vth Int. Kongr. vererbungswiss, Berlin, 12301239.Google Scholar
Sansome, F. W., 1940. “Breeding Disease-resistant Plants”, Nature, London, CXLV, 690693.Google Scholar
Schnell, L. O., 1948. “A Study of Meiosis in the Microsporocytes of Interspecific Hybrids of S. demissum × S. tuberosum carried through 4 Back-crosses”, Journ. Agric. Res., LXXVI, 185212.Google Scholar
Stevenson, F. J., Schultz, E. S., Akeley, R. V., and Cash, L. C., 1945. “Breeding for Resistance to Late Blight in the Potato”, Amer. Potato Journ., XXII, 203222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. T., 1945. Thirty-sixth Annual Report, John Innes Horticultural Institution, II.Google Scholar