Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:10:07.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XIII.—The Abdominal Portion of the Alimentary System in Hapalemur and Lepilemur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

D. V. Davies
Affiliation:
Professor of Anatomy, St Thomas's Hospital Medical School
W. C. Osman Hill
Affiliation:
Prosector, Zoological Society of London.
Get access

Synopsis

A detailed consideration of the morphology, peritoneal and topographical relations, blood supply and certain aspects of the histology of the alimentary tube are considered in these two rare lemurines, the anatomy of which has hitherto been very incompletely known. Evidence is presented of the structural apartness of Hapalemur from Lepilemur and Lemur and therefore for its separation in a separate subfamily of Lemuridæ. Differences between Hapalemur and Lepilemur are seen in the stomach, cæcum, colon, spleen, liver and gall-bladder. The resemblance of the spleen of Hapalemur to that of the marsupials proclaims its primitive status, while the fissuration and relative sizes of the main hepatic lobes show noteworthy differences in the two genera. In some respects Hapalemur approaches the Cheirogaleinæ, but cannot be included by definition within that subfamily.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Barnett, C. H., 1953. “Spiral structures within the hepatic portal vein of mammals”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 123, 747751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1884. “On some points in the structure of Hapalemur griseus”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 391399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E., 1901. “Notes on the broad-nosed lemur, Hapalemur simus”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1, 121.Google Scholar
Davies, D. V., 1947. “The cardiovascular system of the slow loris (Nycticebus tardigradus malaianus)”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 117, 377410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. V., 1950. “Observations on the anatomy of Perodicticus potto”, Proc. Anat. Soc., J. Anat. Lond., 85, 408.Google Scholar
Elsden, S. R., and Phillipson, A. T., 1948. “Ruminant digestion”, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 17, 705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, W. A. Quoted by Beddard, 1884. Loc. cit.Google Scholar
Garrod, A. H., 1877. “Notes on the visceral anatomy and osteology of the ruminants, with a suggestion regarding a method of expressing the relations and species by means of formulæ”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 318.Google Scholar
Huntington, G. S., 1903. The Anatomy of the Human Peritoneum and Abdominal Cavity. Philadelphia and New York.Google Scholar
Klaatsch, H., 1892. “Zur Morphologie der Mesenterial-bildungen am Darmkanal der Wirbelthiere. II Theil. Säugethiere”, Morph. Jb., 18, IV Heft, 609716.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, W. C., 1916. “The shape and peritoneal relationships of the spleen in monotremes and marsupials”, J. Anat. Lond., 51, 118.Google ScholarPubMed
Milne Edwards, A., and Grandidier, A., 1890. Histoire physique, naturelle et politique de Madagascar. Vol. IX. Paris.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. C., 1916. “Further observations on the intestinal tract of mammals”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 183251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman Hill, W. C., 1953. Primates. Vol. I. Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Osman Hill, W. C., and Davies, D. V., 1954. “The reproductive organs in Hapalemur and Lepilemur”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B. [In the press.]Google Scholar
Osman Hill, W. C., and Rewell, R. E., 1948. “The caecum of primates—Its appendages, mesentery and blood supply”, Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond., 26, 199246.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T., and McAnally, R. A., 1942. “Studies on the fate of carbohydrates in the rumen of the sheep”, J. exp. Biol., 19, 199214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar