Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:31:58.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VIII.—Density Measurements of Rocks in South-west Scotland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Adam C. McLean
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow
Get access

Synopsis

A large number of density measurements of the more important rock-types exposed at the surface in Ayrshire and certain neighbouring areas provide information for the interpretation of gravity measurements. The three methods employed of determining density are (1) laboratory measurements of rock samples, (2) gravimeter measurements in mineshafts, and (3) gravimeter measurements over topographic features.

The first method, the most widely used, is the only one applicable to many of the geological formations. A total of 600 specimens measured cover all the common rock types of the Lower and Upper Palaeozoic systems and their associated igneous rocks. Use of the second method is restricted to Carboniferous rocks, in which records from four mine-shafts—Littlemill 5, Mauchline I, Auchincruive I, and Houldsworth—cover much of the Carboniferous succession in south Ayrshire. The third method was seldom applied as there are few suitable topographic features, independent of geological structure, in Ayrshire.

The results of the measurements are summarized, and their reliability discussed. Two contrasts of rock density of regional importance occur in the sedimentary succession of south Ayrshire—the first at the plane of unconformity between Upper and Lower Old Red Sandstone, and the second between Lower Old Red Sandstone and the Lower Palaeozoic greywackes. A marked contrast of local importance occurs between the Permian sandstones of the Mauchline Basin and the underlying lavas and Carboniferous rocks. In north Ayrshire the most important density contrast lies between the Upper Palaeozoic sediments and the associated dense igneous rocks—the Clyde Plateau Lavas, the Millstone Grit lavas, and the thick dolerite intrusions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Bott, M. H. P., and Masson-Smith, D., 1957. “The Geological Interpretation of a Gravity Survey of the Alston Block and the Durham Coalfield”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc, 113, 93116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. H., and Thirlaway, H. I. S., 1952. “A Gravimeter Survey in the Bristol and Somerset Coalfields”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 107, 225286.Google Scholar
Cook, A. H., and Thirlaway, H. I. S., 1955. “The Geological Results of Measurements of Gravity in the Welsh Borders”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 111, 4770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domzalski, W., 1955. “Three-dimensional Gravity Survey”, Geophys. Prosp., 3 1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, S., 1950. “Density Determinations by Underground Gravity Measurements”, Geophysics, 15, 215225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K., 1953. “Some Remarks on the Interpretation of Gravitational and Magnetic Anomalies”, Geophys. Prosp., 1, 2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclintock, W. F. P., and Phemister, J., 1929 a. “A gravitational Survey over the buried Kelvin Valley at Drumry, near Glasgow“, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 56, 141155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclintock, W. F. P., and Phemister, J., 1929 b. “A Gravitational Survey over the Pentland Fault near Portobello, Midlothian, Scotland”, Summ. Progr. Geol. Surv., Lond., 1928, 1028.Google Scholar
Nettleton, L. L., 1939. “Determination of Density for Reduction of Gravimeter Observations”, Geophysics, 4, 176183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasnis, D. S., 1952. “A Study of Rock Densities in the English Midlands”, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. Geophys. Suppl., 6, 252271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, D. W., 1956. “Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies in North Wales”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 111, 375397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. R., 1952. “Subsurface Gravity Measurements”, Geophysics, 17, 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetton, J. T., Myers, J. O., and Smith, R., 1957. “Correlation of Rock Density Determinations for Gravity Survey Interpretation”, Geophys. Prosp., 5. 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar