Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T18:49:31.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards an informed public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

D. S. Ingram
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

The successful utilisation of recent advances in plant biotechnology for the benefit of mankind, with the avoidance of fundamental mistakes that could lead to environmental disaster, requires wise and balanced legislation. In addition, the conservation of the habitats and germplasm so essential to plant breeding requires carefully planned management of resources. These, however, depend upon an informed public with a sensitivity to, and knowledge and understanding of, the issues at stake. It is the people, after all, who influence decision making by governments, through the ballot box or through the pressure of public opinion. Botanic Gardens have a vital role to play in public education, and have the capacity to become the shop windows for the whole of plant science.

Four examples of public education in plant biology being developed at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh are considered, as follows:

(i) Public information, as exemplified by the provision of information about plants, lectures about plants and the development of ecological plantings and displays relating to agriculture, plant breeding and conservation.

(ii) Contact through art, as exemplified by the Andy Goldsworthy retrospective exhibition of 1990 and the 1991 exhibitions of the work of Redouté and Margaret Stones, in which the media of sculpture and painting inspired by the natural world have been used to build bridges between plant science and the wider public.

(iii) Education in primary schools, as exemplified by the ‘Living in a Rainforest’ project, in which young people and their teachers spend periods of time in a replica of a Bornean longhouse and through this experience develop an understanding of the importance of the balance between people and the complex ecosystem of the rainforest.

(iv) Education in secondary schools, as exemplified by the Science and Plants for Schools project in which rapid cycling Brassica rapa and other materials are used in the development of new and exciting approaches to the teaching of experimental plant science, genetics and breeding.

The ways in which projects such as these can be designed to convey important messages concerning plant breeding, genetic engineering, germplasm and habitat conservation and the role of plants in the world economy are discussed, and ideas for other approaches to public education in the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh are outlined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, 1990. Redouté's Roses. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Ltd.Google Scholar
Anon, 1991. Spring, Summer, Autumn and winter discovery packs. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.Google Scholar
Curran, J., Lamont, M., Gooding, A., & Kennedy, I. 1991. DNA technology in school education – 1. Construction of a nucleotide data base and restriction enzyme analysis. Biotechnology Education 2, 21–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. 1990. Up the Amazon: a multicentre environmental education project. World Studies Journal 8, 3941.Google Scholar
Edwards, I., & Radcliffe, D. 1991. The demonstration garden. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.Google Scholar
Edwards, I., Thompson, A., & Radcliffe, D. 1991. Botanical guide to the plant houses. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. D., & Willison, J. 1990. Green inheritance: the role of botanic gardens in environmental education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Our Common Future. Adelaide: Australian Association for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
Fincham, J. R. S., & Ravetz, J. R. 1991. Genetically engineered organisms – benefits and risks. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, T., & Goldsworthy, A. 1990. Hand to earth – Andy Goldsworthy Sculpture 1976–1990. Leeds City Art Gallery and Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: Henry Moore Centre for the Study of Sculpture.Google Scholar
Heywood, C.A., Heywood, V.H., & Wyse Jackson, P., 1990. International Directory of Botanical Gardens. Koenigstein:Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Price, R. 1991. Perfect plants for projects Biological Sciences Review 4, 32–6.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. W. J. 1989. A Bhutanese planting scheme at the Younger Botanic Garden. Plants Today 2, 42–4.Google Scholar
Stones, M., & Urbatsch, L. 1991. Flora of Louisiana. Baton Rouge & London: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. P., & Williams, P. H. 1990. Fast plants for finer science: an introduction to the biology of rapid-cycling Brassica campestris (rapa) L. Journal of Biological Education 24, 239–50.Google Scholar
Williams, P. H. 1989. Rapid-cycling Brassicas. Carolina Tips 52, 57.Google Scholar
Williams, P. H., & Hill, C. B. 1986. Rapid-cycling populations of Brassica. Science 232, 1385–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed