Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:53:20.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sitka spruce silviculture in Scottish forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Alan J. Low
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Sitka spruce is the most important species grown in Scottish forests thanks to its high yield potential, site tolerance and wood properties. It is easily raised from seed or cuttings, and can be readily established and tended under a wide range of site conditions using uncomplicated silvicultural techniques. Spaced furrow ploughing and site drainage are normally required for afforestation; and cultivation may also be desirable prior to restocking. Planting at 2500 trees/ha is done in late winter and spring. Weed control may be necessary, particularly to prevent Calluna-induced growth check. On poor sites, repeated fertiliser application prior to canopy closure can be essential to ensure satisfactory growth, and use of nursing mixtures may be worthwhile. Wherever possible, pole stage crops are thinned regularly to enhance stem quality and diameter growth, but on high windthrow hazard sites the onset of windthrow can be delayed by leaving crops unthinned. After an economic rotation of forty-five to sixty years, crops are clear felled and replanted. During establishment, deer control measures are often required to prevent browsing damage. Damage by insects and fungi is seldom serious, provided that bark-feeding insects are controlled by insecticide at time of replanting, and development of fungal butt rot is minimised by urea treatment of fresh stumps.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhous, J. R. 1972. Nursery practice. Forestry Commission Bulletin 43. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Binns, W. O. 1975. Fertilisers in the forest. Forestry Commission Leaflet 63. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Brazier, J. D., Hands, R., & Seal, D. T. 1985. Structural wood yields from Sitka spruce: the effect of planting spacing. Forestry and British Timber 14, 3437.Google Scholar
Brown, R. M. 1973. Cold storage of forest plants. Forestry Commission Forest Record 88. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R. 1984. Spring frost damage on young Picea sitchensis. 1. Occurrence of damaging frosts in Scotland compared with Western North America. Forestry 57, 159175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., & Smith, R. I. 1984. Spring frost damage in young Picea sitchensis. 2. Predicted dates of budburst and probability of frost damage. Forestry 57, 177197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. B., & Mutch, W. E. S. 1979. The management of red deer in plantations. In The ecology of even-aged plantations. Proceedings of the meeting of Division 1, I.U.F.R.O., Edinburgh 1978, eds. Ford, E. D., Malcolm, D. C., & Atterson, J., pp. 453462. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Dannatt, N., & Davies, E. J. M. 1970. To wait or not to wait? Sitka spruce regeneration problems at Inverliever. Scottish Forestry 24, 1720.Google Scholar
Day, W. R. 1957. Sitka spruce in British Columbia. A study in forest relationships. Forestry Commission Bulletin 28. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Davies, E. J. M. 1984. The Silvicultural Group 1982/1983. Scottish Forestry 38, 189191.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. N., & Christie, J. M. 1981. Yield models for forest management. Forestry Commission Booklet 48. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Evans, H. F. 1987. Sitka spruce insects: past, present and future. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 157167.Google Scholar
Everard, J. E. 1973. Foliar analysis, sampling methods, interpretation and application of results. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 67, 5166.Google Scholar
Faulkner, R. 1987. Genetics and breeding of Sitka spruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 4150.Google Scholar
Ford-Robertson, F. C. 1971. (Editor). Terminology of forest science, technology, practice and products. Washington, D.C.: Society of American Foresters.Google Scholar
Forestry Commission 1983. Census of woodlands and trees 1979–1982: Scotland. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Gregory, S. C., & Redfern, D. B. 1987. The pathology of Sitka spruce in northern Britain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 145156.Google Scholar
Hamilton, G. J., and Christie, J. M. 1971. Forest management tables (metric). Forestry Commission Booklet 34. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hands, R. 1985. Timber research on the output of structural grade timber in unthinned Sitka spruce grown at different spacings. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 97/85WU. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hibberd, B. G. 1986. Forestry practice. Forestry Commission Bulletin 14. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
John, A., & Mason, W. L. 1987. Vegetative propagation of Sitka spruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 197203.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1987a. Choice of seed origins for the main forest species in Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 66. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1987b. Selection of Sitka spruce seed origins for use in British forests. Forestry Commission Bulletin (in preparation).Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1987c. Seed origin variation in Sitka spruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 2539.Google Scholar
Low, A. J. 1973. The effective planting season in Scotland. Scottish Forestry 27, 48.Google Scholar
Low, A. J., (Editor) 1985. Guide to upland restocking practice. Forestry Commission Leaflet 84. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J., Wood, R. F., Edwards, M. V., and Aldhous, J. R. 1957. Exotic forest trees in Great Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 30. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Malcolm, D. C. 1975. The influence of heather on silvicultural practice—an appraisal. Scottish Forestry 29, 1424.Google Scholar
Malcolm, D. C. 1987. Some ecological aspects of Sitka spruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 8592.Google Scholar
Mason, W. L. 1985a. Precision sowing and undercutting. In Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1985, p. 14. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Mason, W. L. 1985b. Vegetative propagation of conifers using stem cuttings. 1. Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 90/84/SILN. London: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, R. 1981. Fertiliser treatment of Sitka spruce in the establishment phase in upland Britain. Scottish Forestry 35, 313.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, R. 1984. Phosphate fertilisers in upland forestry—types, application rates and placement methods. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 89/84 SILN. London: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, R. 1985. Fertiliser experiments in established conifer stands. Forestry Commission Forest Record 127. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Miller, H. G. 1981. Forest fertilisation: some guiding concepts. Forestry 54, 157167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. G., & Miller, J. D. 1987. Nutritional requirements of Sitka spruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 7583.Google Scholar
Miller, K. F. 1983. Cultivation, drainage and site preparation. In Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1983, pp. 1617. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Miller, K. F. 1985. Windthrow hazard classification. Forestry Commission Leaflet 85. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Miller, K. F. 1987. Forestry practice in relation to windthrow. Forestry Commission Bulletin (in preparation).Google Scholar
Miller, K. F., & Coutts, M. P. 1986. A provisional comparison of ploughing and subsoiling in relation to growth and stand stability of Sitka spruce in upland forests. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 104/86/SILN. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, J. F., & Taylor, C. S. 1984. Chemical silviculture (chemical thinning and respacement). Scottish Forestry 38, 8388.Google Scholar
Pyatt, D. G., & Low, A. J. 1986. Forest drainage. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 103/86/SILN. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, P. R. 1985. Glades for deer control in upland forests. Forestry Commission Leaflet 86. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Reynard, B. R., & Low, A. J. 1984. The use of “tatter” flags for exposure assessment in upland forestry. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 96/84/SILN. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Rollinson, T. J. D. 1985. Thinning control. Forestry Commission Booklet 54. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sale, J. S. P., Tabbush, P. M., & Lane, P. B. 1986. The use of herbicides in the forest. Forestry Commission Booklet 51. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Scott, T. M., & King, C. J. 1974. The large pine weevil and black pine beetles. Forestry Commission Leaflet 58. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Stoakley, J. T., Heritage, S. G., & Martin, A. F. 1985. The pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) and black pine beetles (Hylastes spp.). In Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1985, p. 40. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. M. 1984. Scandinavian scarifiers and their potential for site preparation in British forestry. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 84/84/SILN. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. M. 1985. Plant handling. In Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1985, p. 15. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. M. 1986a. What's new in plant handling. Forestry and British Timber 15, 3032.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. M. 1986b. Rough handling, soil temperature and root development in outplanted Sitka spruce and Douglas fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. M. 1987. Desiccation of bare-rooted conifer transplants during handling. Forestry 60 (in press).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. M. A. 1985. The return of nursing mixtures. Forestry and British Timber 14, 1819.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. M. A. 1985b. Second rotation deep peat sites. In Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1985. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. G. M. 1970. Ploughing practice in the Forestry Commission. Forestry Commission Forest Record 70. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. A. 1978. Forest ploughs. Forestry Commission Leaflet 70. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. A. 1979. Forest drainage schemes. Forestry Commission Leaflet 72. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D. 1982. No thin—no action. Scottish Forestry 36, 183194.Google Scholar
Wood, R. F. 1955. Studies of North-west American forests in relation to silviculture in Great Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 25. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Worrell, R. 1987. The influence of major site factors in the productivity of Sitka spruce on upland sites in northern Britain. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar