No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Redevelopment of biological activity in strip-mine spoils: saprotrophic fungal assemblages of grass roots
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011
Synopsis
The development of fungal assemblages on root-surfaces of Agropyron trachycaulum growing in control, peat, fertiliser, or sewage-amended oil sand tailings was followed over a four-year period. Although the number of fungal species isolated from the root-surfaces differed significantly among the amendments, species numbers did not change significantly within treatments over the four years. The species composition of the assemblages, however, changed considerably from year to year. Species abundance distributions for fungal assemblages from the control, peat, and fertiliser amended spoil were best described by logarithmic functions. Distributions from the sewage-treated spoil were best fitted by exponential functions. Although species composition changed over time, the forms of the species abundance distributions were not altered. The observed structure and dynamic nature of fungal assemblages on root-surfaces may not be a consequence of disturbance, but may be a typical feature of such assemblages. High nutrient addition to mine spoils can result in altered species abundance patterns, and may lead to a decrease in community stability.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1988
References
Anderson, R. Y., Coleman, D. C., & Cole, C. V. 1981. Effects of saprophytic grazing on net mineralization. In Terrestrial Nitrogen Cycles, eds. Clark, F. C. & Rosswall, T. pp. 201–215. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Ecological Bulletin 33.Google Scholar
Bissett, J. & Widden, P. 1972. An automatic multichamber, soil-washing apparatus for removing fungal spores from soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 18, 1399–1404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, D. C., Ingham, R. E., McClellan, J. F. & Trofymow, J. A. 1984. Soil nutrient transformations in the rhizosphere via animal-microbial interactions. In Invertebrate Microbial Interactions, eds. Anderson, J. M., Rayner, A. D. M. & Walton, D. W. H., pp. 35–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin and the Ordination of Plant Communities. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, L. F., Gilmour, C. M., Lynch, J. M. & Tittemore, D. 1984. Bacterial colonization of plant roots. In Microbe-Plant Interactions, eds. Giddens, J. E. & Todd, R. L., pp. 1–16. ASA Special Publication Number 47. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Giddens, J. E. & Todd, R. L. 1984. Rhizosphere microorganisms – overview. In Microbial–Plant Interactions, eds. Giddens, J. E. & Todd, R. L., pp. 51–68. ASA Special Publication Number 47. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Glowacinski, Z. & Jarvinen, O. 1975. Rate of secondary succession in forest bird communities. Ornis Scandinavica 6, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, R. E., Trofymow, J. A., Ingham, E. R. & Coleman, D. C. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecological Monographs 55, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurgensen, M. F. 1979. Microorganisms and the reclamation of mine wastes. In Forest Soils and Land Use, ed. Youngberg, C. T., pp. 251–286. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
May, R. M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M., pp. 81–120. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
May, R. M. 1981. Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. Massachusetts: Smauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Neter, J. & Wasserman, W. 1974. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: R. D. Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. 1978. The restoration of soil productivity. In The Breakdown and Restoration of Ecosystems, eds. Holdgate, M. W. & Woodman, M. J., pp. 213–229. New York: Plenum Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, R. 1963. Structure of diatom communities under varying ecological conditions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 108, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, F. W. 1948. The commonness and rarity of species. Ecology 29, 254–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C. P. P. 1984. Mycorrhizae: a root-soil interface in plant nutrition. In Microbial-Plant Interactions, eds. Gridden, J. E. & Todd, R. L., pp. 29–50. ASA Special Publication Number 47. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Roviera, A. D. & Davey, C. B. 1974. Biology of the rhizosphere. In The Plant Root and Its Environment, eds. Carson, E. W., pp. 153–204. Virginia: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. S. & Parkinson, D. 1961. The growth of saprophytic fungi on root surfaces. Plant and Soil 15, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1980. Resource competition, spatial heterogeneity, and species diversity: an equilibrium approach to plant community structure. American Naturalist 116, 362–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, S. 1985. Management of microbial processes in surface mined land reclamation in western Canada. In Soil Reclamation Processes: Microbial Analyses and Applications, eds. Tate, R. L. III & Klein, D. A., pp. 203–241. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Visser, S., Zak, J. C., Danielson, R. M., Griffiths, C. & Parkinson, D. 1984. Reinstatement of biological activity in severely disturbed soils: effects of different amendments to three different minespoils on selected physical and chemical properties and on Plant growth. Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council Report #RRATC 84–6. Edmonton: Alberta Environment.Google Scholar
Zak, J. C. & Parkinson, D. 1984. Patterns of initial saprophytic fungal colonization of grass roots from two severely disturbed soils. Canadian Journal of Botany 62, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar