Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:13:50.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microbial measurements in relation to sewage pollution of the Firth of Forth, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

James S. Buchanan
James S. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Inveresk Research International, Inveresk Gate, Musselburgh EH21 7UB, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

The history of Edinburgh's sewage disposal to the sea from the open ditch system of the 17th century to the present day, together with the changes in legislation affecting sewage discharges to the firth, are reviewed. During the last thirty years sewage discharges have been monitored monthly for levels of faecal coliform bacteria at approximately thirty-four shore sites and twenty offshore sites. These coliform counts are used as bacteriological indicators of sewage pollution, in order to assess the risk to humans of infections that might result from the consumption of contaminated shellfish or from bathing in sewage-polluted waters. Most of the areas sampled from the inner firth were shown to be grossly polluted, particularly in late summer, and regularly to exceed guideline levels throughout the year. Since the commissioning of the new Seafield sewage works in 1979, a general improvement in bacterial and viral counts has been recorded on the south shore of the inner firth. In the last decade two European Community directives relating to the quality of seawater for bathing and shellfish growing have been promulgated, which set guideline and mandatory levels for the number of faecal coli in seawater. The Scottish Development Department has recently designated five beaches as bathing beaches and two areas on the north and south shores of the firth as shellfish growing areas. These areas have been regularly monitored by the Forth River Purification Board and the published results of both surveys are analysed. The virological studies carried out by the Forth Pollution Group of Napier College before and after the major change in the sewage discharge pattern into the Firth of Forth are reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 93 , Issue 3-4: The Natural Environment of the Estuary and Firth of Forth , 1987 , pp. 363 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. J., Read, P. A., Matthews, J. E. & Watson, P. G. 1981. An investigation of the effects of Edinburgh City Sewage Scheme on the ecology of the Firth of Forth. Report of Napier College, Edinburgh, Survey commissioned by Lothian Regional Council 1973–1981. Edinburgh: Dept. of Biological Sciences, Napier College.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. J., & Read, P. A. 1974. Pollution studies in the Firth of Forth. Marine Pollution Bulletin 5, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anson, A. E. & Ware, G. C. 1974. Survey of distribution of bacterial pollution in the Bristol Channel. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 37, 657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, G. 1969. Discussion of the fate of viruses in a marine environment. Advances in Water Pollution Research 4, 833–834.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. M. 1904. Bacillus typhosus isolated from shellfish in connection with an outbreak of typhoid fever. The Royal Sanitary Congress at Glasgow, 1904. Journal of the Royal Sanitary Institute 25, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabelli, V. J. 1978. New standards for enteric bacteria. In Water pollution microbiology, Vol. 2, ed. Mitchell, R., pp. 233–271. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Cabelli, V. J. 1980. A health effects data base for the derivation of microbial guidelines for municipal effluents. Coastal discharges. Institution of Civil Engineers, London. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, C. E. & Mitchell, R. 1978. A decay model for enteric bacteria in seawater. In Water pollution microbiology, Vol. 2, ed. Mitchell, R., pp. 325–348. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Collet, W. F. 1972. The quality of the Forth estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 71B, 137–141.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities 1976. Council directive of 8 Dec 1975 concerning the quality of bathing waters. Official Journal of the European Communities 1976, pp. 31/1–31/7.Google Scholar
Covill, R. W. 1972. The quality of the Forth estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 71B, 145–170.Google Scholar
Covill, R. W. 1975. Bacteriological, biological and chemical parameters employed in the Forth estuary. In Pollution criteria for estuaries, eds. Helliwell, P. R. & Bossanyi, J., pp. 9.1–9.62. London: Pentech Press.Google Scholar
Crockett, A. S. & Dugdale, J. 1976. Development of Edinburgh's sewage disposal scheme. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 60, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, M. A., Aotacky, A. E. & Hargaden, M. T. 1975. Effect of physical parameters on the in situ survival of E. coli Mc-6 in an estuarine environment. Applied Microbiology 30, 800–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujioka, R. S., Hashimoto, H. H., Siwak, E. B. & Yong, R. H. F. 1981. The effect of sunlight on the survival of intestinal bacteria in seawater. Applied Environmental Microbiology 41, 690–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gameson, A. L. H. 1975. Experiences on the British coast. In Marine pollution and marine waste disposal, eds. Pearson, E. A. & Frangipane, F., pp. 387–399. London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gameson, A. L. H. & Gould, D. J. 1974. Effects of solar radiation on the mortality of some terrestrial bacteria. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Discharge of Sewage from Sea Outfalls, ed. Gameson, A. L. H., pp. 181–220. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Geldreich, E. E. 1966. Sanitary significance of faecal coliforms in the environment. US Department of the Interior. Water pollution control, Res. Ser. Publ. No. WP-20-3, p. 102.Google Scholar
Goyal, S. M., Gerba, C. P. & Melnick, J. L. 1977. Occurrence and distribution of bacterial indicators and pathogens in canal communities along the Texas coast. Applied Environmental Microbiology 34, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, V. W., 1982. Public health, quality of life and lifestyle hazards. In Bacterial indicators of pollution, ed. Pipes, W. O., pp. 149–166. Florida: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
Katznelson, E. & Kedi, S. 1979. Unsuitability of poliovirus as indicators of virological quality of water. Applied Environmental Microbiology 27, 343–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, B. L., Gerba, C. P., Goyal, S. M., Melnick, J. L., Cech, I. & Bogden, G. F. 1979. Relationship between the environmental factors bacterial indicators and the occurrence of enteric viruses in estuarine sediments. Applied Environmental Microbiology 39, 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowson, D. J. 1983. Faecal coliform levels in bathing waters around the outer Firth of Forth. Communicable Diseases (Scotland) 48, 6–9.Google Scholar
Lund, E. 1976. Report of a working group on bacteriological and virological examination of water. Water Research 10, 177–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. D. & McLean, W. R. 1962. Infectious hepatitis traced to the consumption of the raw oysters. American Journal of Hygiene 75, 90–111.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council 1959. Sewage contamination of bathing beaches in England and Wales. Memorandum No. 37. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Metcalf, T. G. 1975. Evaluation of shellfish sanitary quality by indicators of sewage pollution. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the discharge of sewage from sea outfalls; Section B: Indicators of sewage pollution 75–82, ed. Gameson, A. L. H., pp. 75–82. London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, T. G. & Stiles, W. C. 1968. Entroviruses within an estuarine environment. American Journal of Public Health 88, 179–191.Google Scholar
Moore, B. 1971. The health hazards of pollution. In Microbial aspects of pollution, eds. Sykes, G. & Skinner, F. A., pp. 11–32. London and New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, V. P. 1982. Bacterial indicators of pollution. In Bacterial indicators of pollution, ed. Pipes, W. O., pp. 21–42. Florida: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
O.R.S.A.N.C.O. 1971. Total coliform:faecal coliform ratio for the evaluation of raw water bacterial quality. Journal of the Water Pollution Research Federation 43, 630–640.Google Scholar
Pipes, W. O. 1982. Indicators and water quality. In Bacterial indicators of pollution, ed. Pipes, W. O., pp. 83–96. Florida: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
Poynter, S. F. B. 1968. The problems of viruses in water. Water Treatment and Examination 17, 187–204.Google Scholar
Public Health Laboratory Service 1959. Sewage contamination of coastal bathing waters in England and Wales. Journal of Hygiene, Cambridge 57, 435–472.Google Scholar
Read, P. 1987. The intertidal benthos and sediments of particulate shores in the Firth of Forth, Scotland, with particular reference to waste water discharges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 401–413.Google Scholar
Riordan, J. T. 1962. Isolation of enterovirus from sewage before and after vaccine administration. Yale Journal of Biological Medicine 34, 512–521.Google ScholarPubMed
Roos, B. 1956. Hepatitis epidemic conveyed by oysters. Svenska Läkartidningen 53, 989–1103.Google Scholar
de Rouville, M. & Quetin, B. 1983. Marine sewage discharge; disappearance of bacteria. Techniques et Sciences Municipales 78, 43–48.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1972. Pollution in some British estuaries and coastal waters. Chairman, Sir Eric Ashby. 3rd Report. Command 5054. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sieburth, J. M. & Pratt, D. M. 1962. Anticoliform activity of sea water associated with the termination of Skeletonema costatum blooms. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 24, 498–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theios, E. P., Morris, J. G., Rosenbaum, M. J. & Baker, A. G. 1967. Effect of sewage treatment on recovery of poliovirus following mass oral immunisation. American Journal of Public Health 57, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. A. 1987. Coastal pollution—aesthetics and/or health. In Marine treatment of sewage and sludge, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Conference. Brighton, April 1987 (in press).Google Scholar
Watson, P. G. 1978. Microbiological studies in the Firth of Forth (M.Phil. Thesis, Napier College, Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Watson, P. G., Anderson, K. J. & Inglis, J. M. 1980. Viral content of a sewage polluted intertidal zone. Journal of Infection 2, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, P. G., Inglis, J. M., Anderson, K. J. & Read, P. A. 1982. The effect of the introduction of a sewage scheme on the virological quality of an intertidal zone. Journal of Infection 5, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation 1977a. Health criteria and epidemiological studies related to coastal water pollution. Athens 1–4 March, 1977. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation 1977b. Guides and criteria for recreational quality of beaches and coastal waters. Bilthoven, Oct.-Nov. 1977. Euro 3125 (1). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Wood, P. C. 1979. Public health aspects of shellfish from polluted waters. In Biological indicators of water quality, eds. James, A. & Evison, L., Chap. 13, pp. 10–18. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Zobell, C. E. 1946. Marine microbiology. Waltham, Mass: Chronica Botanica Co.Google Scholar