Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:54:57.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Macrophytic vegetation of fresh and brackish waters in and near the Loch Druidibeg National Nature Reserve, South Uist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

D. H. N. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of St Andrews
E. D. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of St Andrews
J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of St Andrews
Get access

Synopsis

Centred on Loch Druidibeg, macrophyte vegetation was surveyed in and around 30 lochs in northern South Uist. Alkalinity ranges from 0·014 to 2·33 m.-equiv −1, conductivity (25°C) from 100 to 33,900 μs cm−1, chlorinity from 0·66 m.-equiv −1 upwards. Lochs are classed broadly as non-calcareous (gneissic), calcareous (machair) and brackish. This is an example of a Hebridean range not found elsewhere in the British Isles. Fen vegetation is highly modified by grazing, whilst tall reedswamp and floating-leaved plants are scarce on the mainly exposed and rocky shores, factors which contribute to the predominance of Fucoids in brackish water, of the open Littorella-Lobelia association in non-calcareous water. The Potamogeton filiformis-Chara association is confined to sand in calcareous machair lochs. Deep freshwater vegetation is typified by Isoetes, Potamogeton perfoliatus and P. praelongus.

The very wide ranges in alkalinity and conductivity are reflected in some unusual species' distributions. For example, in freshwater lochs (conductivity up to 660 μs cm−1) several species like Isoetes lacustris, confined elsewhere to oligotrophic water, also occur in South Uist at moderately high alkalinities (to 1·8 m. -equiv 1−1). Conductivity varies with chloride concentration in all but the calcareous (machair) lochs; brackish lochs range from 2500 μs cm −1), which floristically, apart from Fucus ceranoides, is fresh water, to Fucoid-dominated rocks, and Ruppia on silt, in conductivities up to 33,900 μs cm−1. Of other angiosperms, Potamogeton gramineus appears to tolerate conductivities of 22,000 μs cm −1. Causal distribution in general is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G., and Warburg, E. F., 1962. The Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Golterman, H. L., 1970. Methods for chemical analysis of fresh waters. I.B.P. Handbook, 8.Google Scholar
Haslam, S., Sinker, C., and Wolseley, P., 1975. British water plants. Fid Stud., 4, 243351.Google Scholar
Nature Conservancy Council, 1977. Outer Hebrides. Localities of Geological and Geomorphological Importance. Black, G. P., Ed. Newbury: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Parke, M., and Dixon, P. S., 1976. Check-list of British marine algae: third revision. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 56, 527594.Google Scholar
Spence, D. H. N., 1960. Studies on the vegetation of Shetland. III. Scrub in Shetland and in South Uist, Outer Hebrides. J. Ecol., 48, 7395.Google Scholar
Spence, D. H. N., 1964. The macrophytic vegetation of lochs, swamps and associated fens. In: The Vegetation of Scotland. Burnett, J. H., Ed., pp. 306425. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Spence, D. H. N., 1967. Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes, with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland. J. Ecol., 55, 147170.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1973. The application of some electrochemical methods to the measurement of photosynthesis and respiration in fresh water. Freshwat. Biol., 3, 335362.Google Scholar