Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:11:59.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Historical Consideration of the Siphonophores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Mary P. Winsor
Get access

Extract

In his report of the Challenger siphonophores Ernst Haeckel sketches a picture of biological debate and solution calculated to excite historians and philosophers of biology. Here is a distinct zoological issue, Haeckel suggests, to which Darwin's theory of evalution both gives new meaning and offers a solution. Only an evolutionist, Haeckel implies, could see the flaws in previous ideas and wield the powerful tool of embryology to uncover the truth. It sounds as if the siphonophores can provide what has long been wanted, a nice case-study of the impact of Darwinism upon classical zoology, that is, upon comparative anatomy, morphology and classification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 73: Challenger Expedition Centenary Proceedings 2 , 1972 , pp. 315 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Agassiz, Alexander, 1865. North American Acalephae. Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv.,1.Google Scholar
Agassiz, Louis (with A. A. Gould), 1848. Principles of Zoology. Boston.Google Scholar
Agassiz, Louis, 1849. Twelve Lectures on Comparative Embryology. Boston.Google Scholar
Agassiz, Louis, 1860. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States, 3. BostonGoogle Scholar
Allman, George James 1865. Notes on the Hydroida. 2. The production of an Aeginidan by gemmation from Geryonia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 15, 468–474.Google Scholar
Claus, Carl, 1884. Ueber das Verhältniss von Monophyes zu den Diphyiden sowie über den phylogenetischen Entwicklungsgang der Siphonophoren. Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
Eschscholtz, Johan Friedrich, 1829. System der Acalephen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, Carl, 1854a. Beiträge zur nähern Kenntniss der Schwimmpolypen (Siphonophoren). Z. Wiss. Zool., 5, 285–343.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, Carl, 1854b. Ueber Diphyes turgida n. sp., nebst Bemerkungen über Schwimmpolypen. Z. Wiss. Zool., 5, 442–454.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, Carl, 1854c. Zur Lehre vom Generationswechsel und der Fortpflanzung bei Medusen und Polypen. Verh. Phys.-Med. Ges. Würzb., 4, 154–221.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, Carl, 1859. Neue Beiträge zur Näheren Kenntniss der Siphonophoren. Nova Acta Acad. Caesar. Leop. Carol., 27, 332–424.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1869a. Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Siphonophoren. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1869b. Ueber Arbietstheilung in Natur- und Menschenleben. Berlin.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1878. Gesammelte populare Verträge aus dent Gebeite der Entwickelungslehre. Bonn.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst, 1888. The Siphonophores. Rep. Scient. Res. Voy. HMS Challenger, Zool., 28.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas henry, 1849. On the anatomy and affinities of the family of the Medusae. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 2, 413–434.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry, 1852. Upon animal individuality. Not. Proc. Meet. Memb. Roy. Instn, 1, 184–189.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry, 1877. A Manual of the Anatomy of the Invertebrated Animals, London.Google Scholar
Kölliker, Albert, 1853. Die Schwimmpolypen oder Siphonophoren von Messina. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Leuckart, Rudolf (with Heinrich Frey), 1847. Beiträge zur Kenntniss wirbelloser Thiere. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Leuckart, Rudolf, 1848. Über die Morphologie und die Verwandtschaltsverhältnisse der wirbellose Thiere. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Leuckart, Rudolf, 1851a. Ueber Metamorphose, ungeschlechtliche Vermehrung, Generationswechsel. Z. Wiss. Zool., 3, 170–188.Google Scholar
Leuckart, Rudolf, 1851b. Ueber den Polymorphismus der Individuen oder die Erscheinungen der Arbeitstheilung in der Natur: ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Generationswechsel. Giessen.Google Scholar
Leuckart, Rudolf, 1851c. Ueber den Bau der Physalien und der Röhrenquallen im Allgemeinen. Z. Wiss. Zool., 3, 189–212.Google Scholar
Mechnikov, Il'ya, 1874. Studien über die Entwickelung der Medusen und Siphonophoren. Z. Wiss. Zool., 24, 15–83.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, Henri, 1827. Organisation. Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, Henri, 1840. Observations sur la structure des Acalèphes hydrostatique. C.R.Hebd. Séan. Acad. Sci., Paris, 10, 780–781.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, Henri, 1851. Introduction à la Zoologie Générate, chap. 3. Paris.Google Scholar
Müller, Fritz, 1921. Briefe. (Ed. Alfred, Moller.) Jena.Google Scholar
Perrier, Edmond, 1881. Les Colonies Animates et la Formation des Organismes. Paris.Google Scholar
Sars, Michael, 1846. Fauna Littoralis Norvegiae, 1, 31–46.Google Scholar
Steenstrup, Johan Japetus Smith, 1842. Om Fortplantning og Udvikling gjennem vexlende Generationsraekker. Copenhagen. Transl. into German 1842, into English 1845.Google Scholar
Totton, Arthur Knyvett, 1965. A Synopsis of the Siphonophora. London.Google Scholar
Vogt, Carl, 1848. Ocean und Mittlemeer; Reisebriefe. Frankfurt-am-Main.Google Scholar
Vogt, Carl, 1851. Untersuchungen über Thierstaaten. Frankfurt-am-Main.Google Scholar
Winsor, Mary Pickard, 1971. Issues in the Classification of Radiates: 1830–1860. Dissertation, Yale Univ., New Haven.Google Scholar