Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:21:12.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVI.—The Heather Rhizomorph Fungus, Marasmius androsaceus Fries*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

J. A. Macdonald
J. A. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Botany Department, St Andrews University.
Get access

Extract

Increasing attention has been paid to dying-out of heather in Scotland over the last fifteen years. The question is of considerable economic importance, owing to the huge areas of grazing involved. Cameron (1937), Morison (1938) and Cameron, McHardy and Bennett (1944) have dealt with the entomological side of the problem. Braid and Tervet (1937) have stressed the necessity of a fuller study of fungi on heather and, particularly, of the heather rhizomorph fungus.

The present work, begun in 1939, was undertaken to determine the identity, parasitism, distribution and characters of the heather rhizomorph fungus and of any other fungi capable of attacking heather in Scotland. The heather rhizomorph fungus proved to be the only one isolated from heather which acted as a parasite. Accordingly, the others were not investigated further.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , 1949 , pp. 230 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Ainsworth, G. C., 1937. The Plant Diseases of Great Britain, London.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. D., 1935. “A comparative study of certain species of Marasmius and Collybia in culture”, Mycologia, XXVII, 388.Google Scholar
Badcock, E. C., 1941. “New methods for the cultivation of wood-rotting fungi”, Trans. Brit. myc. Soc., XXV, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badcock, E. C., 1943. “Methods for obtaining fructifications of wood-rotting fungi in culture”, Trans. Brit. myc. Soc., XXVI, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavendamm, W., 1928. “Über das Vorkommen und den Nachweis von Oxydasen bei holzzerstörenden Pilze”, Zeits. PflKrankh., XXXVIII, 257.Google Scholar
Bavendamm, W., 1936. “Erkennen, Nachweis und Kultur der holzverfärbenden und holzzersetzenden Pilze”, Hand. Biol. ArbMeth., XII, 927.Google Scholar
Berkeley, M. J., 1860. Outlines of British Fungology, London.Google Scholar
Braid, K. W., and Tervet, I. W., 1937. “Certain botanical aspects of the dying-out of heather”, Scot. Journ. Agr., XX, 365.Google Scholar
Buller, A. H. R., 1931. Researches on Fungi, vol. IV, London.Google Scholar
Buller, A. H. R., 1933. Ibid., vol. V, London.Google Scholar
Bulliard, M., 1791. Histoire des Champignons de la France.Google Scholar
Burch, C. R., and Stock, J. P. P., 1942. “Phase contrast microscopy”, Journ. Sci. Instr., XIX, 71.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. E., 1937. “The Heather Beetle (Lochmœa suturalis)”, Trans. High. Agr. Soc. Scot., XLIX, 111.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. E., McHardy, J. W., and Bennett, A. H., 1944. The Heather Beetle (Lochmæa suturalis); its Biology and Control, British Field Sports Society, Petworth, Sussex.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. H., and Munson, R. G., 1936. “Zone lines in plant tissues. III. The black lines formed by Polyporus squamosus (Huds.) Fr.”, Ann. appl. Biol., XXIII, 453.Google Scholar
Cartwright, K. St G., 1929. “A satisfactory method of staining fungal mycelium in wood sections”, Ann. Bot. Lond., XLIII, 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. W., Campbell, W. A., and Blaisdell, D. J., 1938. “Differentiation of wood-decaying fungi by their reactions on gallic or tannic acid medium”, Journ. Agr. Res., LVII, 683.Google Scholar
Dennis, R. W. G., 1948. “Higher fungi of Wester Ross”, Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., XXXIV, 397.Google Scholar
Fries, E. M., 1821. Systema Mycologicum, Gryphiswaldiæ.Google Scholar
Greville, R. K., 1824. Flora Edinensis.Google Scholar
Gwynne Vaughan, H. C. I., and Barnes, B., 1937. The Structure and Development of the Fungi Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J., 1821. Flora Scotica, London.Google Scholar
Kniep, H., 1928. Die Sexualität der neidern Pflanzen, Jena.Google Scholar
Lange, J. E., 1935–1940. Flora Agaricana Danica, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J., 1777. Flora Scotica, London.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1934. “The life-history and cultural characteristics of Typhula gyrans (Batsch) Fries”, Ann. appl. Biol., XXI, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1937. “A study of Polyporus betulinus (Bull.) Fries”, Ann. appl. Biol., XXIV, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1938. “Fomes fomentarius (Linn.) Gill. [Ungulina fomentaria (Linn.) Pat.] on birch in Scotland”, Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., XXXII, 396.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1947. “An improved technique for the study of living mycelium”, Trans. Brit. myc. Soc., XXXI, 92.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. A., 1949. “Structure of the resting nucleus in Marasmius androsaceus Fries”, Nature, CLXIII, No. 4145, 579.Google Scholar
Massee, G., 1893. British Fungus-Flora, London.Google Scholar
Morison, G. D., 1938. The Heather Beetle (Lochmæa suturalis Thomson), Aberdeen Journals Ltd.Google Scholar
Noble, M., 1937. “The morphology and cytology of Typhula Trifolii Rostr.”, Ann. Bot. Lond., n.s., 1, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, J., 1923. A Handbook of the Larger British Fungi, London.Google Scholar
Rawlins, T. E., 1933. Phytopathological and Botanical Research Methods, New York.Google Scholar
Rea, C., 1922. British Basidiomycetes, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rostrup, E., 1870. “Farøernes Flora”, Bot. Tidskr., IV, 106.Google Scholar
Rostrup, E., 1901–1908. Botany of the Faroes, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Saccardo, P. A., 1887. Sylloge Fungorum, V.Google Scholar
Saccardo, P. A., 1898–1931. Sylloge Fungorum, XIII–XXV.Google Scholar
Sass, J. E., 1929. “The cytological basis for homothallism and heterothallism in the Agaricaceæ”, Amer. Journ. Bot., XVI, 663.Google Scholar
Smith, R., 1938. “Report of the annual conference of the cryptogamic section”, Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., XXXII, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowerby, J., 1799. British Fungi, t. 94.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J., 1886. British Fungi, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G., and Chipp, T. F., 1926. Aims and Methods in the Study of Vegetation, London.Google Scholar
Withering, W., 1801. An Arrangement of British Plants, 4th Ed., London.Google Scholar