Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T06:20:50.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XII.—On the Pollen and Diatom Flora contained in the Surtarbrandur of East Iceland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Bernard L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Botany
John Pirrit
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow.
Get access

Synopsis

The exact age of the basalts and intercalated tuff-beds of Iceland is still uncertain. Palæontological dating relies almost solely on plant fossils the occurrence of which is known from many different localities in western Iceland. No plant fossils have hitherto been found in eastern Iceland. In summer 1952 an expedition set out from Scotland to search for plant fossils and lignite deposits intercalated in the East Icelandic Volcanic Series. Such deposits were found on the northern flank of the mountain Tungufell.

Macroscopical remains of plants were rare and badly preserved as compared with the finds in western Iceland, but a microscopical investigation of the lignite yielded 22 types of pollen and spores and 19 species and varieties of diatoms. The flora differs from that known of western Iceland; macroscopical remains and pollen of Abietineæ are abundant in western Icelandic sediments but are entirely absent in the Tungufell flora. The Tungufell flora appears to be younger than the fossil flora of western Iceland; however, the possibility that the difference between the Tungufell flora in East Iceland and the flora found in West Icelandic deposits is due to different ecological factors cannot be excluded. Many further investigations are required before this question may be satisfactorily answered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Askelsson, J., 1946 a. “Er hin smasaeja Flora surtarbrandslaganna vaenleg til könnunar?” Skyrslu Menntaskolans i Reykjavik skolaarid, 19451946.Google Scholar
Askelsson, J., 1946 b. “Um grodurmenjar i Porishlidartjalli vid Selardal”, Andvara, 71, 1946.Google Scholar
Heer, O., 1868. Flora Fossilis Arctica, Vol. I. Zürich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T., 1951. “Fossil Plants from Washing Bay, Co. Tyrone, II. Sphagnaceæ”, Irish Nat. J., 10, 150.Google Scholar
Klaus, W., 1950. “Palynologische Untersuchungen an der oberpannonen Braunkohle von Neufeld a.d.L.”, Ph.D. Thesis, No. 7769 (Phil. Faculty, University of Vienna).Google Scholar
Meyer, B. L., 1956. “Mikrofloristische Untersuchungen an jungtertiaeren Braunkohlen im oestlichen Bayern”, Geol. Bavar., No. 25, 100128.Google Scholar
Pirrit, J., 1953. “The Scottish Iceland Expedition 1952”, Geogr. Mag. Lond., 26, 235243.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., Thomson, P. W., and Thiergart, F., 1950. “Zur Nomenklatur und Klassifikation der neogenen Sporomorphae (Pollen und Sporen)”, Geol. Jb., 65, 3569.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. W., and Pflug, H., 1953. “Pollen und Sporen des Mitteleuropäischen Tertiärs,” Palaeontographica, B, 94, 14.Google Scholar