Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:33:51.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant biotechnology: aspects of its application in industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

B. J. Miflin
Affiliation:
Ciba-Geigy Seeds, CIBA-GEIGY, Postfach, CH-4002 Basle, Switzerland
Get access

Synopsis

Plant biotechnology can serve industrial concerns in two ways; it can lead to new products and to new ways of producing an existing product (i.e. ‘processes’). The technology can be used in any business involved in using or selling plant products. In the agricultural input business molecular genetics is having most effect on the introduction of new variation into crop plants. The first products are likely to involve the introduction of insect and disease resistance and herbicide tolerance; some genes transferred will change product quality. Future applications will involve the control of more complex traits. Biotechnology will also enhance plant breeding via improved technologies (e.g. RFLPs and tissue culture); also the production of hybrids is likely to be enhanced and extended. Early products will also include the production of rDNA microbial products for control of pests and diseases.

Of considerable concern to businesses is whether or not they can make sufficient financial return on plant biotechnology. The reasons behind this concern are the time it takes to introduce a product to the market; the expenditure on meeting regulatory requirements; the overall level of public acceptance of the products and the level of return from the farmer. To ensure a fair return on investment there also needs to be a secure structure of intellectual property protection (patents, plant breeders rights, etc.). Continued success in the application of plant science to agricultural improvement depends on a proper economic environment as well as the advancement of the science.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1990. Guidelines for the labelling of foods produced using genetic modification. Food Advisory Committee. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food UK.Google Scholar
Baum, M. & Appels, R. 1991. The cytogenetic and molecular architecture of chromosome 1R – one of the most widely utilized sources of alien chromatin in wheat varieties. Chromosoma (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borre, O. 1990. Public opinion on gene technology in Denmark, 1987–1989. Biotech Forum Europe 7, 471–7.Google Scholar
Crouch, M. 1990. Debating the responsibilities of plant scientists in the decade of the environment. The Plant Cell 2, 275–7.Google Scholar
Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A. & Thomas, G. P. 1989. The public understanding of science. Nature 340, 1114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, P. 1990. Root and branch reformer refuses to yield. The Guardian (Manchester, U.K.) June 8th, 1990 p. 28.Google Scholar
Goldburg, R., Rissler, J., Shand, H. & Hassebrook, C. 1989. Biotechnology's bitter harvest; a report of the Biotechnology Working Group. Tides Foundation U.S.A.Google Scholar
Hobbelink, H. 1991. Biotechnology and the future of world agriculture. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. 1984. The limits of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1987. Introduction of recombinant organisms into the environment: key issues. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Perlak, F. J., Deaton, R. W., Armstrong, T. A., Fuchs, R. L., Sims, S. R., Greenplate, J. T. & Fischoff, D. A. 1990. Insect resistant cotton plants. Bio/Technology 8, 939–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, N. D. & Tanksley, S. D. 1989. RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 77, 353–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed