Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:55:20.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global classical solution to the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with some realistic boundary conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Chunhua Jin*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China (jinchhua@126.com)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes model with realistic boundary conditions matching the experiments of Hillesdon, Kessler et al. in a two-dimensional periodic strip domain. For the lower boundary, we impose the usual homogeneous Neumann-Neumann-Dirichlet boundary condition. While, for the upper boundary, since it is open to the atmosphere, we consider three kinds of different mixed non-homogeneous boundary conditions, that is, (i) Neumann-Dirichlet-Navier slip boundary condition; (ii) Zero flux-Dirichlet-Navier slip boundary condition; (iii) Zero flux-Robin-Navier slip boundary condition. For boundary conditions (i) and (iii), the existence and uniqueness of global classical solutions for any initial data and any large chemotactic sensitivity coefficient is established, and for boundary condition (ii), the existence and uniqueness of global classical solutions for any initial data and small chemotactic sensitivity coefficient is proved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. A.. Sobolev spaces (New York, Academic Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Acevedo, P., Amrouche, C., Conca, C. and Ghosh, A.. Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary condition. C.R. Math. 357 (2019), 115119.Google Scholar
Biezuner, R. J.. Best constants in Sobolev trace inequalities. Nonlinear Anal. 54 (2003), 575589.Google Scholar
Braukhoff, M.. Global (weak) solution of the chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes equations with non-homogeneous boundary conditions and logistic growth. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 34 (2017), 10131039.Google Scholar
Braukhoff, M. and Tang, B.. Global solutions for chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system with Robin boundary conditions. J. Differ. Equ. 269 (2020), 1063010669.Google Scholar
Chertock, A., Fellner, K., Kurganov, A., Lorz, A. and Markowich, P. A.. Sinking, merging and stationary plumes in a coupled chemotaxis-fluid model: A high-resolution numerical approach. J. Fluid Mech. 694 (2012), 155190.Google Scholar
Diaz, J. I. and Veron, L.. Local vanishing properties of solutions of elliptic and parabolic quasilinear equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 290 (1985), 787814.Google Scholar
Di Francesco, M., Lorz, A. and Markowich, P.. Chemotaxis-fluid coupled model for swimming bacteria with nonlinear diffusion: Global existence and asymptotic behavior. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 28 (2010), 14371453.Google Scholar
Duan, R., Lorz, A. and Markowich, P.. Global solutions to the coupled chemotaxis-fluid equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 35 (2010), 16351673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillesdon, A. J., Pedley, T. J. and Kessler, J. O.. The development of concentration gradients in a suspension of chemotactic bacteria. Bull. Math. Biol. 57 (1995), 299344.Google Scholar
Hillesdon, A. J. and Pedley, T. J.. Bioconvection in suspensions of oxytactic bacteria: Linear theory. J. Fluid Mech. 324 (1996), 223259.Google Scholar
Jin, C.. Global classical solution and stability to a coupled chemotaxis-fluid model with logistic source. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38 (2018), 35473566.Google Scholar
Jin, C.. Periodic pattern formation in the coupled chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system with mixed nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A: Math. 150 (2020), 31213152.Google Scholar
Kessler, J. O.. Path and pattern-the mutual dynamics of swimming cells and their environment. Comments Theor. Biol. 1 (1989), 85108.Google Scholar
Kozono, H., Miura, M. and Sugiyama, Y.. Existence and uniqueness theorem on mild solutions to the Keller-Segel system coupled with the Navier-Stokes fluid. J. Func. Anal. 270 (2016), 16631683.Google Scholar
Lee, H. and Kim, J.. Numerical investigation of falling bacterial plumes caused by bioconvection in a three-dimensional chamber. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 52 (2015), 120130.Google Scholar
Li, Y. and Lankeit, J.. Boundedness in a chemotaxis-haptotaxis model with nonlinear diffusion. Nonlinearity 29 (2016), 15641595.Google Scholar
Peng, Y. and Xiang, Z.. Global existence and convergence rates to a chemotaxis-fluids system with mixed boundary conditions. J. Differ. Equ. 267 (2019), 12771321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuval, I., Cisneros, L., Dombrowski, C., Wolgemuth, C., Kessler, J. and Goldstein, R.. Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (2005), 22772282.Google Scholar
Winkler, M.. Global large-data solutions in a chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes system modeling cellular swimming in fluid drops. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 37 (2012), 319351.Google Scholar
Winkler, M.. Stabilization in a two-dimensional chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes system. Ann. I.H. Poincaré-AN 33 (2016), 13291352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. and Zheng, X.. Global well-posedness for the two-dimensional incompressible chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (2014), 30783105.Google Scholar