Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T10:28:56.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

27.—The Zeros of Optical Coherence Functions and their Utility in the Study of Spectra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

G. M. Thomas
G. M. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This paper shows that the coherence function associated with a band-limited optical spectrum is expressible as an infinite product involving its zeros. Only a finite number of zeros are physically significant and these can be determined from measurements of the visibility of interference fringes; but an ambiguity remains in the sign of the imaginary part of each zero. If the spectrum is to be recovered using the visibility measurements, an auxiliary experiment is needed to supply the necessary signs, but it need not be especially accurate. If the signs are not known there is only a limited number of different spectra that are compatible with the visibility measurements. Finally it is suggested that wavelength measurements made on an asymmetric spectral line with a Michelson interferometer may yield differing results when used with long and short delays.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 70 , 1972 , pp. 281 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Boas, R. P. B., 1954. Entire Functions. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Born, M. and Wolf, E., 1959. Principles of Optics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Copson, E. T., 1935. Functions of a Complex Variable. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dialetis, D., 1967. J. Math. Phys., 8, 1641–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamo, H., 1963. J. Appl. Phys., 34, 875–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendal, M. G. and Stuart, A., 1963. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1, chapter 3. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Lukacs, E., 1960. Characteristic Functions. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Mandel, L. and Wolf, E., 1965. Rev. Mod. Phys., 37, 231–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, E. L. and Walther, A., 1963. Optica Acta, 10, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinard, J., 1967. J. Phys., 28, Colloque C2 suppl., 136–143.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord, 1892. Phil. Mag., 34, 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, P. and Marathay, A. S., 1963. Nuovo Cimento, 30, 1452–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, W. R. C. and Hamon, J., 1963. Rev. Opt. Theor. Instrum., 42, 519–531.Google Scholar
Terrien, J., 1967. J. Phys., Colloque C2 suppl., 3–10.Google Scholar
Tггchmarsh, E. C., 1939. Theory of Functions, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanasse, G. A. and Sakai, H., 1967. Fourier Spectroscopy in Progress in Optics, VI. Ed. Wolf, E.. North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Walther, A., 1963. Optica Acta, 10, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E., 1962. Proc. Phys. Soc., Lond., 80, 1269–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar