Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:00:32.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instrumental Polyphonic Folk Music in Asia Minor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Laurence Picken
Get access

Extract

The polyphonic fiddling of the Black Sea coast of Asia Minor is remarkable enough as a type of folk music; but it is the more remarkable to find such polyphony within the territory of the Islamic musical world, the territory of the purely homophonic (or at most mildly heterophonic) classical Perso-Arabo-Turkic tradition. From passages in the surviving treatises of Al-Kindī (ninth century) and Ibn Sīnā (eleventh century) it is known that these authors were familiar with fourths, fifths and octaves and their use; and in the Mūriṣtus MSS quoted by Farmer, triads are mentioned and their affective properties described. But these are the only traces of such knowledge in the history of a tradition which as it reaches us today is homophonic. The nature of this tradition has often been misunderstood, as is shown by such a statement as: the Arabs never got beyond the stage of homophony. This implies that homophony as practised in the Islamic world is primitive, or if not primitive is yet a stage in the evolution of harmony. Either view is false; false to that which can be observed all over the world at the present time, and historically false as well. The music of Islam is a music of high sophistication, and its sophistication was well established by the ninth century.

Type
Articles
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association , Volume 80 , 1953 , pp. 73 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Musical Association, 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Al-Kindī: in H. G. Farmer, Historical Facts for the Arabian Musical Influence, London, 1930, chapter 8 and appendix 45.Google Scholar

2 Ibn Sīnā: in Farmer, op. cit., loc. cit. See also: Baron R. d’Erlanger, La Musique arabe, Paris, 1935, tom. II, pp. 230, 231.Google Scholar

3 H. G. Farmer, op. cit., pp. 104, 105.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 107.Google Scholar

5 Al-Fārābī: in d’Erlanger, op. cit., Paris, 1930, tom. I, p. 145 et seq; tom. II, 1935, pp. 1–101.Google Scholar

6 Ibn Sīnā: in d’Erlanger, op. cit., 1935, tom. II, p. 156 et seq.Google Scholar

7 Safiyu-d-dīn: in d’Erlanger, op. cit., 1938, tom. III, p. 152 et seq.Google Scholar

8 A. Idelsohn, ‘Die Maqamen der arabischen Musik’, Sammelbände der Internationalen Musikgesellschaft, 15, 1-63 (Leipzig, 1914).Google Scholar

9 M. Sarīsözen, ‘Çok sesli mūzik ve bağlamalar’, Gūzel Sanatlar, 117-124 (Ankara, 1944).Google Scholar

10 Devlet Konservatuvarī Folklor Arşivi: Tunceli, 1944; Pl. No.: 1247a, Gül türküsü (Süleyman Kaya, Ismail Oğuz).Google Scholar

11 M. Sarīsözen, ‘Kaval, tulum, çifte’, Güzel Sanatlar, 106-110(Ankara, 1942).Google Scholar

12 A. A. Saygun, Rize, Artvin ve Kars havâlisi türkü, saz ve oyunlarī hakkīnda bazi malûmat, Istanbul, 1937.Google Scholar

13 Devlet Konservatuvarī Folklor Arşivi: Çoruh, 1950, Pl. No.: 1668 B 2, Viçe horon havasī (Mustafa Şişman).Google Scholar

In this and other examples, the open strings are marked at their first appearance. Slurs indicate the bowing. Pitches are only approximately accurate.Google Scholar

14 Columbia RT 17596: Sīk Sara Horon Havasī (Turkish Recording).Google Scholar

15 A. A. Saygun, Yedi Karadeniz Türküsü ve bir horonu, Istanbul Konservatuvarī Folklor Kūlliyati, Halk Tūrkūleri, 15ci defter Istanbul. no date, p. 51.Google Scholar

16 V. Uspenski i V. Belaiev, Turkmenskaia Muzika, Moscow, 1928.Google Scholar

17 M. Schneider, Geschichte der Mehrstimmigkeit, Berlin, I, 1934; II, 1935.Google Scholar

18 V. Belaiev, ‘The Folk-Music of Georgia’, The Musical Quarterly, 19, 417-433 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 G. Reese, Music in the Middle Ages, New York, 1940.Google Scholar

20 R. Lach, ‘Die Musik der türk-tatarischen, finnisch-ugrischen und Kaukasus-Völker, u.s.w.’, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 50, 23-50 (1920); ‘Gesänge russischer Kriegsgefangener, III. Bd. Kaukasusvölker, I. Abt. Georgische Gesänge’, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 204, 4. Abhg. pp. 1–254 (1928); ibid. 2. Abt. ‘Mingrelische, abchasische, swanische und ossetische Gesänge’, Sitzungsberichte, 205, 1. Abhg. pp. 1-63 (1931).Google Scholar

21 H. Besseler, Die Musik des Mittelalters und der Renaissance, Potsdam, 1935.Google Scholar

22 C. Sachs, The Rise of Music in the Ancient World, East & West, New York, 1943.Google Scholar

23 Sarīsözen's transcription of a koçek havasī for çifte. See p. 76.Google Scholar