Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T11:22:14.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Further Review of Recent Advances in Palethnology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Get access

Extract

In continuation of my former review of advances made in recent years in the science of palethnology, it seems to me that, in view of the rapidity with which our knowledge of this subject has increased during the last eighteen months or so, it will be opportune and acceptable to once more put before prehistorians a summary of this newly-acquired knowledge, and to point out the great interest and importance of the discoveries which have made that knowledge possible.

I must confess to a certain amount of satisfaction in recognising that some of the forecasts of future, discoveries which I foreshadowed in my former article have in some measure been fulfilled, while some of the lines of research which I suggested might be followed up have been investigated and are in process of partial solution. One of the most important of these, the investigation into the causes and meaning of the “patination” of flint, was worked at by the late Dr. Canton, of Ipswich, who carried through a series of highly interesting experiments in which flints were subjected to the action of various solvents, and it is my hope that some account of this work will be laid before the scientific world in the near future.

Type
Original Papers
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , 1914 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Antea, pp. 135–139.

2. Antea, pp. 171–184, and 347–359.

3. Antea, pp. 17–143.

4. Lankester, Sir Ray.–“The discovery of a novel type of flint implements below the base of the Red Crag of Suffolk.” Phil. Trans., Series B., Vol. 202, pp. 283–336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Antea, pp. 307–319.

6. Antea, pp. 160–168.

7. Antea, pp. 194–209.

8. Dawson, and Woodward, Smith.–“On the discovery of a Palæolithic skull and mandible in a flint-bearing gravel overlying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at Piltdown, Fletching (Sussex).”– Q.J.G.S., March, 1913, Vol. LXIX Google Scholar.

9. Smith, Reginald A.–“On the date of Grime's Graves and Cissbury Flint Mines.”–Archæologia, Vol. LXIII., pp. 109–158 Google Scholar. Antea, pp. 210–232. Dr.Peake, A. E. –“An account of a flint factory at Peppard Common.”–Archæological Journal, Vol. LXX., pp. 33–68 Google Scholar. Antea, pp. 338–345. Moir, J. Reid.–“On a workshop floor of Lower Middle Aurignacian Age.”–Journal, Ipswich and District Field Club, Vol. IV., pp. 7–12 Google Scholar. Marr, J. E.–“A Late Palæolithic site on Wretham Heath, near Thetford.” Antea, pp. 374–379 Google Scholar.

10. Antea, pp. 43–105 and 254–396.

11. I understand that Mr. Moir does not claim that all the scratches upon the flints are due to agricultural operations, but in view of his researches it seems probable that a good proportion may have had such an origin.