Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:02:57.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body mass index and waist circumference: implications for classifying the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the Royal Navy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

A. M. Shaw
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants, PO12 2DL, UK
D. Simpson
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants, PO12 2DL, UK
T. Davey
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants, PO12 2DL, UK
J. L. Fallowfield
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants, PO12 2DL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United Kingdom Royal Navy (RN) is increasing( Reference Allsopp, Scarpello and Andrews 1 , Reference Dziubak, House and Taylor2 ). The consequential health and economic implications of this worrying trend are considerable, and may reduce the physical capability of a force that is required to be “fit to fight”. The RN has a duty of care to ensure that all personnel are physically fit and healthy. As such, it is imperative that the RN determines the magnitude of this problem and the most appropriate methods of monitoring any trends over time.

A stratified sample of 600 RN personnel, aged 18–61 years old, consented to participate in the study from fifteen different land bases and two ships. Participants had their height; body mass (from which Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated), and waist circumference measured at one time point.

Participants with a BMI ≥25.0 kg.m−2 were classified as being overweight or obese and participants with a BMI <25.0 kg.m−2 were classified as being a normal weight. BMI in combination with waist circumference measurements were used to classify participants as being at no risk of obesity related diseases, or at any increased risk of obesity related diseases, according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines( 3 ) (Table below).

According to the BMI measurements a total of 65% and 44% of male and female participants, respectively, were classified as being overweight or obese. In comparison, when the NICE risk classification guidelines were applied, a total of 30% of both male and female participants were classified as being at any increased risk of obesity related diseases.

When comparing the differences in the present study between the two different methods of classifying participants ‘at risk’, the BMI method rated males 35% higher and females 14% higher, in comparison with the NICE risk classification method. Thus, BMI may be an inappropriate method of measuring adiposity in the RN. These findings highlight the importance of using BMI in combination with waist circumference measurements to classify risk, which supports the current measurement guidelines in the Armed Forces Weight Management Policy( 4 ).

The high prevalence of participants being classified ‘at risk’ is of concern in a force that is required to be physically fit and healthy. This emphasises the requirement for health promotion activities to modify the eating and physical activity behaviours of RN personnel to improve health and to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity.

References

1. Allsopp, A, Scarpello, E, Andrews, S et al. (2003) J Roy Nav Med Serv 89(1), 1118.Google Scholar
2. Dziubak, A, House, C, Taylor, R et al. (2011) Institute of Naval Medicine Report 2011.042.Google Scholar
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2010) CG43.Google Scholar
4. Ministry of Defence. (2009) 2009DIN01-181.Google Scholar