Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T11:43:11.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Territorial Knowledge Ontology as a Guide for the Identification of Resource of the Territory Toward Sustainability

Part of: Responsible Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Amer Ezoji  and
Nada Matta

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Representation of territorial knowledge based on the ontology is an approach which explains the nature and reasoning of this knowledge for sustainability. This research proposes an ontology of domain according to the principles for modelling an ontology. This proposed ontology is named DOTK (descriptive ontology for territorial knowledge). DOTK ontology has specialized the entities of territorial knowledge for sustainability and its aim is enhancing the sustainable knowledge of actors within industries. This ontology is a guide for identifying an operational ontology of real example. This research show that ontology of domain can assist to the identifying of tangible and intangible resources of the local territory. So, these identified resources can help the industries and territory for sustainable objectives and improve the available territorial knowledge within local or regional industries.

Keywords

OntologiesSustainabilityKnowledge management
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3391 - 3400
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Allais, R., Roucoules, L. and Reyes, T. (2017), “Governance maturity grid: a transition method for integrating sustainability into companies?”, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 140, pp. 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.069Google Scholar
Allais, R., Roucoules, L. and Reyes, T. (2015), “Inclusion of territorial resources in the product development process”, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 94, pp. 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.091Google Scholar
Allais, R., Reyes, T. and Roucoules, L. (2013), “Exploratory study of the inclusion of territorial resources in design process”, ICED2013, pp. 10.Google Scholar
Bachimont, B., Isaac, A. and Troncy, R. (2002, October), “Semantic commitment for designing ontologies: a proposal”, International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Heidelberg, Springer, Berlin, pp. 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_14.Google Scholar
Bachimont, B. (2000), “Engagement sémantique et engagement ontologique: conception et réalisation d'ontologies en ingénierie des connaissances”, Ingénierie des connaissances: évolutions récentes et nouveaux défis, pp. 305–323.Google Scholar
Borgo, S. and Masolo, C. (2009), “Foundational choices in DOLCE”, Handbook on ontologies, Heidelberg, Springer, Berlin, pp. 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_16Google Scholar
Brachman, R.J., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Resnick, L.A. and Borgida, A. (1991), “Living with CLASSIC: When and how to use a KL-ONE-like language”, Principles of semantic networks, pp. 401–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-0771-1.50022-9Google Scholar
Bouaud, J., Bachimont, B., Charlet, J. and Zweigenbaum, P. (1995, August), “Methodological principles for structuring an “ontology””, Proceedings of the IJCAI'95 Workshop on “Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
Buclet, N. (2011), “Territoire, innovation et développement durable: l’émergence d'un nouveau régime conventionnel?”, Revue d’Économie régionale & urbaine No. 5, pp. 911–940. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.115.0911Google Scholar
Dahlman, C.T., Renwick, W.H. and Bergman, E. (2015), Introduction to Geography: People, places & environment, Pearson.Google Scholar
Debonneuil, M. (2007), L'espoir économique: vers la révolution du quaternaire, Bourin éd.Google Scholar
Fensel, D. (2001), Ontologies, pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04396-7_2Google Scholar
Figuière, C. and Rocca, M. (2008, November), “Un développement véritablement durable: quelle compatibilité avec le capitalisme financier?”, Colloque international” La problématique du développement durable vingt ans après: nouvelles lectures théoriques, innovations méthodologiques et domaines d'extension”, CLERSE, Lille, 20-22 novembre 2008. https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.8641Google Scholar
Francesconi, A. (2015), “The Territory as a Reference Key”, Advanced Cultural Districts, Palgrave Pivot, London, pp. 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137555359_3Google Scholar
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C. and Oltramari, A. (2003), “Sweetening wordnet with dolce”, AI magazine, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18Google Scholar
Gruber, T.R. (1993), “A translation approach to portable ontology specification”, Knowledge acquisition, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 199–220. http://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S., Ny, H., Robèrt, K.H. and Broman, G. (2010), “An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision systems for product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 8, pp. 703–712. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.017Google Scholar
Jordão, R.V.D. and Novas, J.C. (2017), “Knowledge management and intellectual capital in networks of small-and medium-sized enterprises”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-11-2016-0120Google Scholar
Oberle, D., Ankolekar, A., Hitzler, P., Cimiano, P., Sintek, M., Kiesel, M., Mougouie, B., Baumann, S., Vembu, S., Romanelli, M. and Buitelaar, P. (2007), “DOLCE ergo SUMO: On foundational and domain models in the SmartWeb Integrated Ontology (SWIntO)”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.06.002Google Scholar
Pecqueur, B. (2006), “Le tournant territorial de l’économie globale”, Espaces et sociétés No. 1, pp. 17–32. https://doi.org/10.3917/esp.124.0017Google Scholar
Ševcenko, M. (2003), “Online presentation of an upper ontology”, Proc. of Znalosti 2003.Google Scholar
Vadoudi, K., Bratec, F. and Troussier, N. (2017), “A GIS-oriented semantic data model to support PLM for DfS”, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijplm.2017.10008304Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Rio, M., Allais, R., Zwolinski, P., Carrillo, T.R., Roucoules, L., Mercier-Laurent, E. and Buclet, N. (2013), “Toward an systemic navigation framework to integrate sustainable development into the company”, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 54, pp. 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.054Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Buis, J.J. and Sutherland, J.W. (2015), “LCA-oriented semantic representation for the product life cycle”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 86, pp. 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.053Google Scholar