Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:20:36.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating the Product Development Process in Scientific Research. Bridging the Research-Market Gap

Part of: Methods of Design Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

David Mesa ,
Christine Thong ,
Charles Ranscombe  and
Blair Kuys

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Science and technology generated by Universities has many challenges in reaching commercial product applications, as has been explored in a range of literature. Product design has been identified to add value through various types of contributions in addressing these challenges; however, there remains a gap in literature to explore how and when product development activities can practically be applied to technology development.

This paper furthers the idea that the product development process can help bridge the gap between the laboratory and commercial applications by proposing a framework for how Ulrich and Eppinger's product development process can integrate with the STAM technology development model. This is a significant step towards understanding how in practice these disciplines can work together to bring science and technology from the laboratory to products in the marketplace.

Keywords

TechnologyNew product developmentDesign methodsCollaborationScience
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2805 - 2814
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bradley, S.R., Hayter, C.S. and Link, A.N. (2013), “Proof of concept centers in the United States: An exploratory look”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 349–381, available: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9309-8.Google Scholar
Branscomb, L. and Auerswald, P.E. (2002), “Between invention and innovation an analysis of funding for early-stage technology development”.Google Scholar
Brem, A. and Voigt, K.-I. (2009), “Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry”, Technovation, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 351–367, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.003.Google Scholar
Caetano, M. and Amaral, D.C. (2011), “Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments”, Technovation, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 320–335, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.005.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2008), Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, Wiley.Google Scholar
Driver, A., Peralta, C. and Moultrie, J. (2011), “Exploring how industrial designers can contribute to scientific research”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 5 No. 1.Google Scholar
Eppinger, S. and Ulrich, K. (2015), Product design and development, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B.R.C. (2000), “The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research policy, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 313–330, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. and Silberman, J. (2003), “University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 17–30, available: http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021674618658.Google Scholar
Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D'Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M. and Johnson, A. (2001), “Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end””, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 46–55, available: http://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418.Google Scholar
Kotlarewski, N.J., Kuys, B. and Thong, C. (2016), “Design innovation: a tool for value-adding to the Papua New Guinea balsa wood industry”, Journal of Design, Business & Society, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 183–196, available: http://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.2.183_1.Google Scholar
Livesey, F., Minshall, T. and Moultrie, J. (2006), “Investigating the technology-based innovation gap for the United Kingdom”, Report to the Design Council.Google Scholar
Maia, C. and Claro, J. (2013), “The role of a Proof of Concept Center in a university ecosystem: an exploratory study”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 641–650, available: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9246-y.Google Scholar
Mankins, J.C. (1995), “Technology readiness levels”, White Paper, April, 6.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. and Lee, J.-Y. (1996), “The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support”, Research policy, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 1047–1058, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1.Google Scholar
Markham, S.K. (2002), “Moving technologies from lab to market”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 31–42, available: http://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671531.Google Scholar
Markham, S.K., Green, S.G. and Basu, R. (1991), “Champions and antagonists: Relationships with R&D project characteristics and management”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 8 No. 3-4, pp. 217–242, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(91)90012-G.Google Scholar
Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P.H. and Balkin, D.B. (2004) “Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 29 No. 3-4, pp. 353–364, available: http://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034127.01889.86.Google Scholar
Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P.H. and Balkin, D.B. (2005), “Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market”, Research policy, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 1058–1075, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007.Google Scholar
Minshall, T., Seldon, S. and Probert, D. (2007), “Commercializing a disruptive technology based upon University IP through Open Innovation: A case study of Cambridge Display Technology”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 4 No. 03, pp. 225–239, available: http://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877007001107.Google Scholar
Moody, S. (1980), “The role of industrial design in technological innovation”, Design studies, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp. 329–339, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(80)90039-3.Google Scholar
Moultrie, J. (2015), “Understanding and classifying the role of design demonstrators in scientific exploration”, Technovation, Vol. 43, p. 1–16, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.002.Google Scholar
O'shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A. and Roche, F. (2005), “Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities”, Research policy, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 994–1009, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.Google Scholar
OECD (2017), “OECD Science”, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2017.Google Scholar
Phaal, R., O'Sullivan, E., Routley, M., Ford, S. and Probert, D. (2011), “A framework for mapping industrial emergence”, Technological forecasting and social change, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 217–230, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.018.Google Scholar
Roozenburg, N.F. and Eekels, J. (1995), Product design: fundamentals and methods, John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Rust, C. (2004), “Design enquiry: Tacit knowledge and invention in science”, Design issues, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 76–85, available: http://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311959.Google Scholar
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003), “Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study”, Research policy, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 27–48, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2.Google Scholar
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E. and Link, A.N. (2004), “Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 21 No. 1-2, pp. 115–142, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.Google Scholar
Simeone, L., Secundo, G. and Schiuma, G. (2016) “Adopting a design approach to translate needs and interests of stakeholders in academic entrepreneurship: The MIT Senseable City Lab case”, Technovation, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.12.001.Google Scholar
Stember, M. (1991), “Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise”, The Social Science Journal, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1–14, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B.Google Scholar
Thong, C. and Kuys, B. (2012), “A Empirical Study of Industrial Design Contribution to Advances in Timber Materials Science’, in Advanced Materials Research”, Trans Tech Publ, pp. 248–253, available: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.415-417.248.Google Scholar
Wessner, C.W. (2005), “Driving innovations across the valley of death”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 9–12, available: http://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2005.11657289.Google Scholar
Würmseher, M. (2017) “To each his own: Matching different entrepreneurial models to the academic scientist's individual needs”, Technovation, Vol. 59, pp. 1–17, available: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.002.Google Scholar
Zappe, H. (2013) “Innovation: Bridging the market gap”, Nature, Vol. 501 No. 7468, p. 483, available: http://doi.org/10.1038/501483a.Google Scholar