Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:51:33.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis and Evaluation in the Early Stages of Designing Resource Efficient Offerings: A Comparison among Large Companies and Small and Medium Enterprises

Part of: Responsible Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Sergio Andres Brambila-Macias  and
Tomohiko Sakao

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Europe there is a common vision to transform the economy into a sustainable one by 2050 which among other changes, calls for companies to address their offerings in a more resource-efficient manner. Therefore, efforts to provide design support namely, methods, guidelines and tools to specifically address natural resources and impact of products and services have been increasing. Moreover, companies of all sizes should integrate environmental concerns as early as possible to select profitable and environmentally sound offerings. However, knowledge of the analysis and evaluation of resource- efficient offerings seems currently insufficient especially with regards to similarities and differences among different company sizes. In this paper, the study of eight case companies: 3 large companies and 5 SMEs, shows how industry addresses the analysis and evaluation of their offerings. Commonalities among SMEs and large companies include decisions made by strategic or managerial boards, the use of mock-ups and project management skills, among others. These findings could help academics in providing relevant, useful and usable support to industry.

Keywords

EvaluationEcodesignDecision making
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3161 - 3170
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ardente, F., Beccali, G., Cellura, M. and Marvuglia, A. (2006), “POEMS: a case study of an Italian wine-producing firm”, Environmental management, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 350–364. https://doi/org/10.1007/s00267-005-0103-8Google Scholar
Bieda, J. (1992), “A product-cycle cost-analysis process and its application to the automotive environment”, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 21-23 Jan. 1992, IEEE, pp. 422–425. https://doi/org/10.1109/ARMS.1992.187858Google Scholar
Blessing, L. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM: A Design Research Methodology, Springer, London. https://doi/org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1_2Google Scholar
Bovea, M. and Pérez-Belis, V. (2012), “A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 61–71. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012Google Scholar
Brezet, H. and Van Hemel, C. (1997), Ecodesign. A Promising Approach to Sustainable Production and Consumption, United Nations Publication, Paris.Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. (1988), “An ethnographic perspective on engineering design”, Design studies, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 159–168. https://doi/org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90045-2Google Scholar
Byggeth, S., Broman, G. and Robèrt, K.-H. (2007), “A method for sustainable product development based on a modular system of guiding questions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.007Google Scholar
Cai, W. and Li, G. (2018), “The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 176, pp. 110–118. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109Google Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design studies, Vol. 47, pp. 118–163. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002Google Scholar
Charles, O. H. Jr, Schmidheiny, S. and Watts, P. (2017), Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B. and Wen, C.-T. (2006), “The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan”, Journal of business ethics, Vol. 67 No. 4, pp. 331–339. https://doi/org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Junginger, S. and Lockwood, T. (2009), “Design thinking and design management: A research and practice perspective”, Design Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 46–55. https://doi/org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2009.00007.xGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer, London. https://doi/org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1Google Scholar
DeSimone, L. D. and Popoff, F. (2000), Eco-Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development, MIT press, United States of America.Google Scholar
Deutz, P., McGuire, M. and Neighbour, G. (2013), “Eco-design practice in the context of a structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers”, Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 117–128. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.035Google Scholar
DiCicco-Bloom, B. and Crabtree, B. F. (2006), “The qualitative research interview”, Medical education, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 314–321. |https://doi/org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.xGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2015), User Guide to the SME Definition. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017), Resource Efficiency, European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/index_en.htm accessed December 2018.Google Scholar
Fernández-Viñé, M. B., Gómez-Navarro, T. and Capuz-Rizo, S. F. (2010), “Eco-efficiency in the SMEs of Venezuela. Current status and future perspectives”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 8, pp. 736–746. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.005Google Scholar
Gero, J. S. (1990), “Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design”, AI magazine, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 26–36. https://doi/org/10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854Google Scholar
Gluch, P. and Baumann, H. (2004), “The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making”, Building and environment, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 571–580. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.008Google Scholar
Graedel, T. and Allenby, B. (1996), Design for Environment, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.Google Scholar
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J. and Dekoninck, E. (2008), “Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature”, Design studies, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 160–180. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001Google Scholar
Kaźmierczyk, P., Stenbaek Hansen, M., Günther, J., McKinnon, D., Loewe, C., Lingvall, F., Kallay, T.K., Szlezak, J., Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Herczeg, M. and Wittmer, D. (2011), Resource Efficiency in Europe: Policies and Approaches in 31 EEA Member and Cooperating Countries. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Kazmierczyk, P., Geerken, T., Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Vanderreydt, I., Veen, J.V., Veneziani, M., De Schoenmakere, M. and Arnold, M. (2016), “More from less: material resource efficiency in Europe; 2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries”.Google Scholar
Kihlander, I. (2011), Managing Concept Decision Making in Product Development Practice, PhD, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Chen, W. and Schmidt, L. (2006), Decision Making in Engineering Design, ASME Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lindahl, M. (2001), “Environmental effect analysis - how does the method stand in relation to lessons learned from the use of other design for environment methods”, Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, December 11-15, IEEE, United States of America, pp. 864–869. https://doi/org/10.1109/.2001.992482Google Scholar
López-Mesa, B. and Bylund, N. (2011), “A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 7–27. https://doi/org/10.1007/s00163-010-0093-2Google Scholar
Luttropp, C. and Lagerstedt, J. (2006), “EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 15–16, pp. 1396–1408. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022Google Scholar
Masui, K., Sakao, T., Aizawa, S. and Inaba, A. (2002), “Quality function deployment for environment (QFDE) to support design for environment (DFE)”, ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 29–October 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 415–423. https://doi/org/10.1115/DETC2002/DFM-34199Google Scholar
Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A. and Perks, H. (2011), “New product development best practice in SME and large organisations: theory vs practice”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 227–251. https://doi/org/10.1108/14601061111124902Google Scholar
Robson, C. (2011), Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, John Wiley and Sons, 3rd edition, West Sussex.Google Scholar
Schöggl, J.-P., Baumgartner, R. J. and Hofer, D. (2017), “Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140 No. 3, pp. 1602–1617. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195Google Scholar
Sim, S. K. and Duffy, A. H. (2003), “Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 200–223. https://doi/org/10.1007/s00163-003-0037-1Google Scholar
Sisodia, R. S. (1992), “Competitive advantage through design”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 33–40. https://doi/org/10.1108/eb039525Google Scholar
Sitarz, D. (1993), Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet, Earth Press, Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Thies, C., Kieckhäfer, K., Spengler, T. S. and Sodhi, M. S. (2018), “Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 30 April 2018. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.039Google Scholar
Ullman, D. G. (2002), The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Wallace, K. and Burgess, S. (1995), “Methods and tools for decision making in engineering design”, Design studies, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 429–446. https://doi/org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00019-NGoogle Scholar
van Hemel, C. and Cramer, J. (2002), “Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 439–453. https://doi/org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00013-6Google Scholar
Wrisberg, N., de Haes, H. A. U., Triebswetter, U., Eder, P. and Clift, R. (2002), Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective: The Combined use of Analytical Tools, Springer, Netherlands. https://doi/org/10.1007/978-94-010-0456-5Google Scholar
Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M. R. and Chong, Y. S. (2015), “Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, Part A, pp. 1115–1122. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.039Google Scholar
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. and Kildienė, S. (2014), “State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods”, Technological and economic development of economy, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 165–179. https://doi/org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Ang, B. and Poh, K. (2006), “Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update”, Energy, Vol. 31 No. 14, pp. 2604–2622. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.023Google Scholar