Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-25T07:23:05.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying Magnetic Fields using Low-frequency Pulsar Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2018

C. Sobey
Affiliation:
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research - Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia email: c.sobey@curtin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Low-frequency polarisation observations of pulsars, facilitated by next-generation radio telescopes, provide powerful probes of astrophysical plasmas that span many orders of magnitude in magnetic field strength and scale: from pulsar magnetospheres to intervening magneto-ionic plasmas including the ISM and the ionosphere. Pulsar magnetospheres with teragauss field strengths can be explored through their numerous emission phenomena across multiple frequencies, the mechanism behind which remains elusive. Precise dispersion and Faraday rotation measurements towards a large number of pulsars probe the three-dimensional large-scale (and eventually small-scale) structure of the Galactic magnetic field, which plays a role in many astrophysical processes, but is not yet well understood, especially towards the Galactic halo. We describe some results and ongoing work from the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) and the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) radio telescopes in these areas. These and other pathfinder and precursor telescopes have reinvigorated low-frequency science and build towards the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), which will make significant advancements in studies of astrophysical magnetic fields in the next 50 years.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Aliu, E., et al. 2011, Science, 334, 69Google Scholar
Bhat, N. D. R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilous, A. V., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A134Google Scholar
Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G., 2005, A&A, 441, 1217Google Scholar
Burn, B. J., 1966, MNRAS, 133, 67Google Scholar
Hale, G. E., 1908, ApJ, 28, 315Google Scholar
Hall, J. S., 1949, Science, 109, 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 868Google Scholar
Hassall, T. E., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A66Google Scholar
Haverkorn, M., et al. 2015, PoS(AASKA14), 096Google Scholar
Hermsen, W., et al. 2013, Science, 339, 436Google Scholar
Hiltner, W. A., 1949, Science, 109, 165Google Scholar
Howard, T. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 208Google Scholar
Johnston, S., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 261Google Scholar
Kondratiev, V. I., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A128Google Scholar
Lenc, E., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. N., 1972, ApJ, 172, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. N., 1974, ApJ, 188, 637Google Scholar
Manchester, R. N., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 224Google Scholar
Noutsos, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A62Google Scholar
Oppermann, N., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A118Google Scholar
Pilia, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A92Google Scholar
Rand, R. J., & Lyne, A. G., 1994, A&A, 268, 497Google Scholar
Sobey, C., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2493Google Scholar
Sotomayor-Beltran, C., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A58Google Scholar
Timokhin, A. N., 2010, MNRAS, 408, L41Google Scholar
Van Eck, C. L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 97Google Scholar
Weltevrede, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 607Google Scholar
Yao, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29Google Scholar
Young, N. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 114Google Scholar