Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:14:14.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revised activity types for Markarian galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

A. M. Mickaelian
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Armenia Email: aregmick@yahoo.com
H. V. Abrahamyan
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Armenia Email: aregmick@yahoo.com
G. S. Harutyunyan
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Armenia Email: aregmick@yahoo.com
G. M. Paronyan
Affiliation:
Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory (BAO), Armenia Email: aregmick@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The sample of Markarian galaxies consists of 1515 UV-excess galaxies containing many active galaxies, both AGN and Starburst (SB). Several catalogs of Markarian galaxies have been published; however activity types are based on old spectroscopic data. The SDSS spectroscopy and some other recent spectral observations allow classify or re-classify many of Markarian galaxies, altogether we have retrieved and studied 779 SDSS and 300 other spectra. Out of 779 SDSS spectra, we have classified 533 HII, 31 Composites, 12 LINERs, 4 S2.0, 5 S1.9, 8 S1.8, 5 NLS1.5, 11 S1.5, 8 NLS1.2, 21 S1.2, 4 NLS1, 4 S1.0, 2 QSO, 11 AGN (without an exact class), 52 Em (HII or AGN), 65 Abs, and 3 Stars. On the other hand, the galaxies are being classified depending on the fact in which wavelength range they have been observed and studied. E.g. some Sy2 type galaxies turn to be Sy1 when classified in IR. Many hidden AGN (in X-ray and IR) appear to be normal galaxies in optical range. So for better understanding, IR spectra are necessary as well.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Ahn, C. P., Alexandroff, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2013, ApJS, in press.Google Scholar
Bicay, M. D., Kojoian, G., Seal, J., et al. 1995, ApJS 98 369Google Scholar
Markarian, B. E., Lipovetski, V. A., Stepanian, J. A., et al. 1989, Com. SAO 62 5Google Scholar
Markarian, B. E., Lipovetsky, V. A., Stepanian, J. A., et al. 1997, Vizier Catalogue VII/172Google Scholar
Mazzarella, J. M. & Balzano, V. A. 1986, ApJS 62 751Google Scholar
Petrosian, A., McLean, B., Allen, R. J. & MacKenty, J. W. 2007, ApJS 170 33Google Scholar
Veilleux, S. & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS 63 295Google Scholar
Veron-Cetty, M. P. & Veron, P. 2010, A&A 518 A10Google Scholar