Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:30:03.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New prescriptions of turbulent transport from local numerical simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

V. Prat ,
F. Lignières  and
G. Lesur
V. Prat
Affiliation:
MPA, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85748, Garching b. München, Germany email: vprat@mpa-garching.mpg.de Université de Toulouse; UPS-OMP; IRAP; Toulouse, France CNRS; IRAP; 14, avenue Édouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France
F. Lignières
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse; UPS-OMP; IRAP; Toulouse, France CNRS; IRAP; 14, avenue Édouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France
G. Lesur
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IPAG, 38000, Grenoble, France CNRS, IPAG, 38000, Grenoble, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Massive stars often experience fast rotation, which is known to induce turbulent mixing with a strong impact on the evolution of these stars. Local direct numerical simulations of turbulent transport in stellar radiative zones are a promising way to constrain phenomenological transport models currently used in many stellar evolution codes. We present here the results of such simulations of stably-stratified sheared turbulence taking notably into account the effects of thermal diffusion and chemical stratification. We also discuss the impact of theses results on stellar evolution theory.

Keywords

Hydrodynamicsturbulencestars: evolutionstars: rotation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S307: New windows on massive stars: asteroseismology, interferometry, and spectropolarimetry , June 2014 , pp. 70 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Deheuvels, S., García, R. A., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2012, ApJ 756, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lignières, F. 1999, A&A 348, 933Google Scholar
Lindborg, E. & Brethouwer, G. 2008, J. Fluid Mech. 614, 303Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1995, A&A 299, 84Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1997, A&A 321, 134Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 1996, A&A 313, 140Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Ekstrom, S., Maeder, A., et al. 2013, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 865, p. 3Google Scholar
Michaud, G. & Zahn, J.-P. 1998, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 11, 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, T. R. & Cox, C. S. 1972, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam. 3, 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prat, V. & Lignières, F. 2013, A&A 551, L3Google Scholar
Prat, V. & Lignières, F. 2014, A&A 566, A110Google Scholar
Talon, S. & Zahn, J.-P. 1997, A&A 317, 749Google Scholar
Zahn, J.-P. 1992, A&A 265, 115Google Scholar