Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T09:09:35.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinematic distances of pre-main-sequence stars in the Lupus star-forming region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

P. A. B. Galli
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 1226 Cidade Universitária, 05508–900 São Paulo SP, Brazil email: galli@astro.iag.usp.br
R. Teixeira
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 1226 Cidade Universitária, 05508–900 São Paulo SP, Brazil email: galli@astro.iag.usp.br
C. Ducourant
Affiliation:
Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers, CNRS-UMR 5804, BP 89, 33270 Floirac, France
C. Bertout
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis, Bd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To reliably determine the main physical parameters (masses and ages) of young stars, we must know their distances. While the average distance to nearby star-forming regions (<300 pc) is often known, the distances to individual stars are usually unknown. Individual distances to members of young moving groups can be derived from their radial velocities and proper motions using the convergent-point strategy. We investigate the kinematic properties of the Lupus moving group with the primary objective of deriving individual distances to all group members.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Comerón, F. 2008, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Vol. II, 295Google Scholar
Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R., Périé, J. P., et al. 2005, A&A, 438, 769Google Scholar
ESA 1997, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1239Google Scholar
Galli, P. A. B., Teixeira, R., Ducourant, C., Bertout, C., & Benevides-Soares, P. 2012, A&A, 538, A23Google Scholar
Girard, T. M., van Altena, W. F., Zacharias, N., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 15Google Scholar
Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1259Google Scholar
Krautter, J., Wichmann, R., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., et al. 1997, A&AS, 123, 329Google Scholar
López Martí, B., Jiménez-Esteban, F., & Solano, E. 2011, A&A, 529, A108Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653Google Scholar
Wichmann, R., Krautter, J., Covino, E., et al. 1997a, A&A, 320, 185Google Scholar
Wichmann, R., Sterzik, M., Krautter, J., Metanomski, A., & Voges, W. 1997b, A&A, 326, 211Google Scholar