Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T15:09:38.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Much Hydrogen is in Type Ib and IIb SN Progenitors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2024

Avishai Gilkis*
Affiliation:
The School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
Iair Arcavi
Affiliation:
The School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars program, CIFAR, Toronto, M5G 1M1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compare pre-supernova observations with synthetic photometry from stellar evolution models to infer the progenitor properties of the seven known progenitors of Type Ib and IIb supernovae. Our results are roughly consistent with a hydrogen mass threshold of for a Type II appearance.

Type
Poster Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Aldering, G., Humphreys, R. M., & Richmond, M. 1994, AJ, 107, 662 Google Scholar
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 Google Scholar
Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Livne, E., Yoon, S.-C., Woosley, S., Waldman, R., & Langer, N. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2985 Google Scholar
Eldridge, J. J., Fraser, M., Maund, J. R., & Smartt, S. J. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2689 Google Scholar
Folatelli, G., Bersten, M. C., Kuncarayakti, H., Benvenuto, O. G., Maeda, K., & Nomoto, K. 2015, ApJ, 811, 147 Google Scholar
Gilkis, A., Vink, J. S., Eldridge, J. J., & Tout, C. A. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4451 Google Scholar
Hachinger, S., Mazzali, P. A., Taubenberger, S., Hillebrandt, W., Nomoto, K., & Sauer, D. N. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 70 Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C. D., Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Piro, A. L., Rest, A., Rojas-Bravo, C., & Siebert, M. R. 2021 a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2112.03308Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2021 b, MNRAS, 504, 2073 Google Scholar
Lanz, T., & Hubeny, I. 2003, ApJS, 146, 417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanz, T., & Hubeny, I. 2007, ApJS, 169, 83 Google Scholar
Maund, J. R., et al. 2011, ApJL, 739, L37 Google Scholar
Paxton, B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34 Google Scholar
Pickles, A. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 863 Google Scholar
Todt, H., Sander, A., Hainich, R., Hamann, W. R., Quade, M., & Shenar, T. 2015, A&A, 579, A75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyk, S. D., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 37 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gilkis and Arcavi supplementary material

Gilkis and Arcavi supplementary material

Download Gilkis and Arcavi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.6 MB