Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:18:19.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examining the optical intensity and magnetic field expansion factor in the open magnetic field regions associated with coronal holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2020

Chia-Hsien Lin
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Space Science, National Central University, Taiwan email: chlin@jupiter.ss.ncu.edu.tw
Guan-Han Huang
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Space Science, National Central University, Taiwan email: chlin@jupiter.ss.ncu.edu.tw
Lou-Chuang Lee
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Coronal holes can be identified as the darkest regions in EUV or soft X-ray images with predominantly unipolar magnetic fields (LIRs) or as the regions with open magnetic fields (OMF). Our study reveals that only 12% of OMF regions are coincident with LIRs. The aim of this study is to investigate the conditions that affect the EUV intensity of OMF regions. Our results indicate that the EUV intensity and the magnetic field expansion factor of the OMF regions are weakly positively correlated when plotted in logarithmic scale, and that the bright OMF regions are likely to locate inside or next to the regions with closed field lines. We empirically determined a linear relationship between the expansion factor and the EUV intensity. The relationship is demonstrated to improve the consistency from 12% to 23%. The results have been published in Astrophysical Journal (Huang et al. 2019).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Hayashi, K., Yang, S., & Deng, Y. 2016, JGRA, 121, 1046 Google Scholar
Huang, G.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Lee, L.-C. 2019, ApJ, 874, 45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krista, L. D. & Gallagher, P. T. 2009, Solar Physics, 256, 87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R. H. 1982, Solar Physics, 79, 203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linker, J. A., Caplan, R. M., Downs, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowder, C., Qiu, J., & Leamon, R. 2017, Solar Physics, 292, 18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowder, C., Qiu, J., Leamon, R., & Liu, Y. 2014, ApJ, 783, 142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R., Bucholtz, F., & Scribner, D. 2003, ITGRS, 41, 1136 Google Scholar
Mogilevsky, E. I., Obridko, V. N., & Shilova, N. S. 1997, Solar Physics, 176, 107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neugebauer, M., Forsyth, R. J., Galvin, A. B., et al. 1998,JGR, 103, 14587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obridko, V. N. & Shelting, B. D. 1989, Solar Physics, 124, 73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obridko, V. N. & Shelting, B. D. 1999, Solar Physics, 187, 195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y.-M. & Sheeley, N. R., Jr. 1990, ApJ, 355, 726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar