Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:22:41.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coronal heating and flaring in QSLs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2011

Guillaume Aulanier
Guillaume Aulanier*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, CNRS, UPMC, Universit Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France email: guillaume.aulanier@obspm.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Quasi-Separatrix Layers (QSLs) are 3D geometrical objects that define narrow volumes across which magnetic field lines have strong, but finite, gradients of connectivity from one footpoint to another. QSLs extend the concept of separatrices, that are topological objects across which the connectivity is discontinuous. Based on analytical arguments, and on magnetic field extrapolations of the Sun's coronal force-free field above observed active regions, it has long since been conjectured that QSLs are favorable locations for current sheet (CS) formation, as well as for magnetic reconnection, and therefore are good predictors for the locations of magnetic energy release in flares and coronal heating. It is only up to recently that numerical MHD simulations and solar observations, as well as a laboratory experiment, have started to address the validity of these conjectures. When put all together, they suggest that QSL reconnection is involved in the displacement of EUV and SXR brightenings along chromospheric flare ribbons, that it is related with the heating of EUV coronal loops, and that the dissipation of QSL related CS may be the cause of coronal heating in initially homogeneous, braided and turbulent flux tubes, as well as in coronal arcades rooted in the slowly moving and numerous small-scale photospheric flux concentrations, both in active region faculae and in the quiet Sun. The apparent ubiquity of QSL-related CS in the Sun's corona, which will need to be quantified with new generation solar instruments, also suggests that QSLs play an important role in stellar's atmospheres, when their surface radial magnetic fields display complex patterns.

Keywords

Magnetic fieldsmagnetohydrosynamicsSun: coronastars: coronae
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S273: The Physics of Sun and Star Spots , August 2010 , pp. 233 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., & Démoulin, P. 2005, Astron. Astrophys, 444, 961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., Démoulin, P., & DeVore, C. R. 2006, Solar Phys., 238, 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulanier, G., Golub, L., DeLuca, E. E., Cirtain, J. W., & Kano, R., et al. 2007, Science, 318, 1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulanier, G., Török, T., & Démoulin, P., DeLuca, E. E. 2010, Astrophys. J., 708, 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., & Mandrini, C. H., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 705, 926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogachev, S. A., Somov, B. V., & Kosugi, T., Sakao, T. 2005, Astrophys. J., 630, 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, T. A. 2011, Proceedinds of the IAU Symposium 273, this issueGoogle Scholar
Chandra, R., Schmieder, B., Aulanier, G., & Malherbe, J.-M. 2009, Solar Phys., 258, 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Démoulin, P., Hénoux, J.-C., Priest, E. R., Mandrini, C.H. 1996a Astron. Astrophys, 308, 643Google Scholar
Démoulin, P., Priest, E.R., Lonie, D. P. 1996b JGR, 101, A4, 7631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Démoulin, P., Bagala, L.G., Mandrini, C.H., Hénoux, J.C., Rovira, M.G. 1997 Astron. Astrophys, 325, 305Google Scholar
Démoulin, P. 2006 Adv. Sp. Res., 37, 7, 1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y. 2010, Astrophys. J., 719, 728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, L., López Fuentes, M. C., & Mandrini, C. H., et al. 2001, Solar Phys., 203, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, L. & Hudson, H. S. 2002, Solar Phys., 210, 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galsgaard, K., Titov, V. S., & Neukirch, T. 2003, Astrophys. J., 595, 506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galsgaard, K. 2011, Proceedinds of the IAU Symposium 273, this issueGoogle Scholar
Gómez, D. O., DeLuca, E. E., & McClymont, A. N. 1995, Astrophys. J., 448, 954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudiksen, B. V. & Nordlund, A. 2005, Astrophys. J., 618, 1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, D. L. & van Hoven, G. 1996, Astrophys. J., 467, 887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M., Schindler, K. 1988 JGR, 93, 5559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, M., Donati, J.-F. et al. 2011 Proceedinds of the IAU Symposium 273, this issueGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, E. E. & Gekelman, W. 2009, PRL, 103, 10, 105002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandrini, C.H., Démoulin, P., Klimchuk, J.A. 2000 Astrophys. J., 530, 999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, S., Pariat, E., Aulanier, G., & Schrijver, C. J. 2009, Astrophys. J., 700, 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, S., Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., & Klein, K. L. 2010, Astrophys. J. (Letters), submittedGoogle Scholar
Mikic, Z., Schnack, D. D. & van Hoven, G., 1989, Astrophys. J., 338, 1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milano, L. J., Dmitruk, P., Mandrini, C. H., Gómez, D. O., & Dmoulin, P. 1999, Astrophys. J., 521, 889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. & Forbes, T. G. 1992, JGR, 97, A12, 1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. & Démoulin, P. 1995, JGR, 100, A12, 23443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. & Démoulin, P. 1997, Solar Phys., 175, 123Google Scholar
Rappazzo, A.F., Velli, M., Einaudi, G., Dahlburg, R.B. 2008 Astrophys. J., 677, 1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restante, A. L., Aulanier, G., & Parnell, C. E. 2009, Astron. Astrophys, 508, 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmieder, B., Aulanier, G., Démoulin, P. & van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., et al. 1997, Astron. Astrophys, 325, 1213Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J., DeRosa, M. L., & Title, A. M. 2010, Astrophys. J., 719, 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titov, V. S. 2007, Astrophys. J., 660, 863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titov, V. S., Hornig, G., & Démoulin, P. 2002, JGR, 107, A8, SSH 3-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ballegooijen, A. A. 1986, Astrophys. J., 311, 1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegelmann, T. 2011, Proceedinds of the IAU Symposium 273, this issueGoogle Scholar
Wilmot-Smith, A. L., Hornig, G., & Pontin, D. I. 2009, Astrophys. J., 696, 1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmot-Smith, A. L., Pontin, D. I., & Hornig, G. 2010, Astron. Astrophys, 516, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar