Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-29T17:26:30.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clumping and X-rays in cool B-Supergiants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2024

Matheus Bernini-Peron*
Affiliation:
Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Mönchhofstr. 12-14, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
W. L. F. Marcolino
Affiliation:
Observatório do Valongo, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio, 20080-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A. A. C. Sander
Affiliation:
Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Mönchhofstr. 12-14, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

B supergiants (BSGs) lie on the cool end of line-driven wind regime, such that the study of their atmospheres can help us to understand the physics of line-driven winds. So far key features of their spectra, especially in the UV region, could not be reproduced consistently with atmosphere models. This represents a significant gap in our knowledge of their physical properties and behavior, which is particularly striking for BSGs on the cool side of the Bi-Stability Jump (cooler than B1). To address this problem, we analysed a sample of Galactic cool BSGs, with sufficient UV and optical coverage. None of our targets are detected in X-rays with only upper limits existing for some of them.

Type
Poster Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481Google Scholar
Berghoefer, T. W., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Danner, R., & Cassinelli, J. P. 1997, A&A, 322, 167Google Scholar
Cantiello, M., Langer, N., Brott, I., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 279Google Scholar
Crowther, P. A., Lennon, D. J., & Walborn, N. R. 2006, A&A, 446, 279Google Scholar
Driessen, F. A., Sundqvist, J. O., & Kee, N. D. 2019, A&A, 631, A172Google Scholar
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Snow, T. P., & Lindholm, D. M. 1995, ApJ, 455, 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazé, Y. 2009, A&A, 506, 1055Google Scholar
Oskinova, L. M., Hamann, W. R., & Feldmeier, A. 2007, A&A, 476, 1331Google Scholar
Petrov, B., Vink, J. S., & Gräfener, G. 2014, A&A, 565, A62Google Scholar
Prinja, R. K. & Massa, D. L. 2010, A&A, 521, L55Google Scholar
Rubio-Díez, M. M., Sundqvist, J. O., Najarro, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A61Google Scholar
Searle, S. C., Prinja, R. K., Massa, D., & Ryans, R. 2008, A&A, 481, 777Google Scholar
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2000, A&A, 362, 295 Google Scholar