Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T04:59:59.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theorems of the Phragmén–Lindelöf Type for Subfunctions in a Cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2016

Lei Qiao*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Bretagne Atlantique, UMR 6205, Université de Bretagne-Sud, Vannes 56000, France (lei.quiao@univ-ubs.fr)
Guoshuang Pan
Affiliation:
Beijing National Day School, 66 Yuquan Rd, Haidian Qu, Beijing 100039, People's Republic of China
*
Corresponding author.

Abstract

Our first aim in this paper is to deal with the maximum principle for subfunctions in an arbitrary unbounded domain. As an application, we next give a result concerning the classical Phragmén–Lindelöf theorem for subfunctions in a cone. For a subfunction defined in a cone that is dominated on the boundary by a certain function, we finally generalize the Phragmén–Lindelöf type theorem by making a generalized harmonic majorant of it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: School of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, People's Republic of China (qiaocqu@163.com).

References

1. Ancona, A., First eigenvalues and comparison of Green's functions for elliptic operators on manifolds or domains, J. Analyse Math. 72 (1997), 4592.Google Scholar
2. Axler, S., Bourdon, P. and Ramey, W., Harmonic function theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 137 (Springer, 1992).Google Scholar
3. Azarin, V. S., Generalization of a theorem of Hayman on subharmonic functions in an m-dimensional cone, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 2 80 (1969), 119138.Google Scholar
4. Gilbarg, D. and Trudinger, N. S., Elliptic partial differential equations of second order (Springer, 1977).Google Scholar
5. Landis, E. M., Second order equations of elliptic and parabolic typer, American Mathematical Society Translations, Volume 171 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998).Google Scholar
6. Levin, B. and Kheyfits, A., Asymptotic behavior of subfunctions of time-independent Schrödinger operator, in Some topics on value distribution and differentiability in complex and p-adic analysis, Chapter 11, pp. 323397 (Science Press, Beijing, 2008).Google Scholar
7. Qiao, L. and Pan, G. S., Lower-bound estimates for a class of harmonic functions and applications to Masaev's type theorem, Bull. Sci. Math. 140(4) (2016), 7085.Google Scholar
8. Qiao, L. and Ren, Y. D., Integral representations for the solutions of infinite order of the stationary Schrödinger equation in a cone, Monatsh. Math. 173 (2014), 593603.Google Scholar
9. Rosenblum, G., Solomyak, M. and Shubin, M., Spectral theory of differential operators (Viniti, Moscow, 1989).Google Scholar
10. Simon, B., Schrödinger semigroups, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 7 (1982), 447526.Google Scholar
11. Verzhbinskii, G. M. and Maz’ya, V. G., Asymptotic behavior of solutions of elliptic equations of the second order close to a boundary, I, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 12 (1971), 874899.Google Scholar