Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:34:03.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SHAPING METHOD ECOSYSTEMS - STRUCTURED IMPLEMENTATION OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING IN INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

David Inkermann*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Clausthal
*
Inkermann, David, Technische Universität Clausthal, Institute for Mechanical Engineering, Germany, inkermann@imw.tu-clausthal.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Systems thinking is vital for engineering of nowadays systems characterized by system spanning interactions and an incresing amount of functions. Systems Engineering (SE) represents an interdisciplinary approach, gaining extensive attention to cope with increasing system complexity. Implementation of SE in existing organizations and processes, however, is facing challenges. As a matter of course there is not out of the box concept to be used, in fact definitions and understandings seem to be based on the background and experience of the individual or organization und differ widely. Thus, motivations and expectations of practitioner are manifold and support to adapte and implement SE-methodolgies is needed. Research presented in this contribution picks up the need to provide orientation for individuals, engineering teams and project managers when implementing SE and to address the specific context in that engineering is carried out. Objective is to describe the core idea of SE by a consistent set of principles. This set is used to build up a context specific understanding of SE as a foundation to introduce new methods and procedures in existing method ecosystems.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bavendiek, A., Inkermann, D. and Vietor, T. (2014), “Konzept zur Methodenbeschreibung und - auswahl auf Basis von Kompetenzen und Zusammensetzung von Entwicklungsteams”, in Symposium Design for X 2014, pp. 215226.Google Scholar
Birkhofer, H., Kloberdanz, H., Sauer, T. and Berger, B. (2002), Why methods don't work and how to get them to work, Zielona Gora.Google Scholar
Blanchard, B.S. and Fabrycky, W.J. (1998), Systems engineering and analysis, Prentice Hall international series in industrial and systems engineering, 3. ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Buede, D.M. (2009), The engineering design of systems: Models and methods, Wiley series in systems engineering and management, 2. ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9780470413791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emes, M.R., Smith, A., James, A.M., Whyndham, M.W., Leal, R. and Jackson, S.C. (2012), “8.1.2 Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections from 45 years of spacecraft technology research and development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory”, INCOSE Int. Sym., Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 10691084.10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01389.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estefan, J.A. (2008), Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies: Rev. B.Google Scholar
Forsberg, K. and Mooz, H. (1992), “The Relationship of Systems Engineering to the Project Cycle”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 3643.10.1080/10429247.1992.11414684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, K. and Mooz, H. (1995), “4.4.4 Application of the ‘Vee’ to Incremental and Evolutionary Development”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 848855.10.1002/j.2334-5837.1995.tb01948.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, M. (2000), “Engineering systems thinking and systems thinking”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 163168.10.1002/1520-6858(200033)3:3<163::AID-SYS5>3.0.CO;2-T3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenthal, S. (2014), A practical guide to SysML: The systems modeling language, Third edition, Morgan Kaufman, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Steffen, D., Czaja, A., Wiederkehr, O. and Tschirner, C. (2015), Systems Engineering in Industrial Practice, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, P.J., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., Kokkolaras, M., Köhler, C., Panarotto, M. and Wilmsen, M. (2020), “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, Vol. 6, p. 49.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C. and Stacey, M. (2017), “What do we need to say about a design method?”, in Maier, A., Kim, H., Oehmen, J., Salustri, F., Škec, S. and Kokkolaras, M. (Eds.), Design theory and research methodology, DS, Curran Associates Inc, Red Hook, NY, pp. 101110.Google Scholar
Haberfellner, R., Weck, O.L. de and Fricke, E. (2019), Systems Engineering: Fundamentals and applications, Birkhäuser, Basel.10.1007/978-3-030-13431-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchins, D.K. (2007), Systems engineering: A 21st century systems methodology, Wiley series in systems engineering and management, John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England, Hoboken, NJ.10.1002/9780470518762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossain, N.U.I., Jaradat, R.M., Hamilton, M.A., Keating, C.B. and Goerger, S.R. (2020), “A Historical Perspective on Development of Systems Engineering Discipline: A Review and Analysis”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huldt, T. and Stenius, I. (2019), “State-of-practice survey of model-based systems engineering”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 134145.10.1002/sys.21466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, C., Rogers, R., Unal, R., Dryer, D., Sousa-Poza, A., Safford, R., Peterson, W. and Rabadi, G. (2003), “System of systems engineering”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 4, p. 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W.N., Seymour, S.J. and Biemer, S.M. (2011), Systems Engineering: Principles and practice, Wiley series in systems engineering and management, Vol. 67, 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamm, J.G. and Weilkiens, T. (2010), “Funktionale Architekturen in SysML”, in In Maurer, M. and Schulze, S.-O. (eds.), Tag des Systems Engineering 2010 Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Germany, November 2010, pp. 109118.Google Scholar
Lohmeyer, Q. and Albers, A. (2012), “Advanced systems engineering - Towards a model-based and human-centered methodology” in Int. Sym. on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering TMCE 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, J.N. (1997), Systems engineering guidebook: A process for developing systems and products, Systems engineering series, CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Sheard, S.A. and Mostashari, A. (2009), “Principles of complex systems for systems engineering”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 295311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D. and Shortell, T.M. (Eds.) (2015), Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities, 4. edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Wallace, K. (2011), “Transferring design methods into practice”, in Birkhofer, H. (Ed.), The Future of Design Methodology, Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 239248.10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weilkiens, T. (2008), Systems Engineering with SysML/UML: Modeling, Analysis, Design, The MK / OMG Press, 1. Edition, Elsevier professional.Google Scholar
Wymore, A.W. (1993), Model-Based Systems Engineering, Systems Engineering Ser, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.Google Scholar