Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T16:20:15.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE USE OF MODEL BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND CAD FOR THE DESIGN OF PHYSICAL PRODUCTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Bernhard Meussen
Bernhard Meussen*
Affiliation:
NORDAKADEMIE gAG
*
Meussen, Bernhard, NORDAKADEMIE gAG, FB Ingenieurwissenschaften, Germany, bernhard.meussen@nordakademie.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Model based systems engineering is often used as an alternative to the document based design of software or other technical systems. Its focus lies on the modelling of procedural aspects of the products, rather than on physical aspects. In mechanical engineering, the geometry and the physical properties of the product like strength, stiffness, kinematic and kinetic behaviour are described by CAD-systems. This paper tries to link model based systems engineering tools with modern CAD tools to facilitate the digitization of the development processes of physical products as part of the digitization of new digital business models.

Keywords

Systems Engineering (SE)Digital / Digitised engineering value chainsProduct modelling / models
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2317 - 2326
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Barbian, M., Gräßler, I., Piller, F., Gülpen, Ch., Welp, P., Kamal, H., Buchegger, Th., Splettstößer, U., Schmidt, M., Schmalfuß, M., Wilkie, J., Krüger, M., Schole, Ph., Bergmair, B., Neuenhanh, M. and Dirzus, D. (2016), Statusreport Digitale Chancen und Bedrohungen - Geschäftsmodelle für Industrie 4.0, Available at https://www.vdi.de/ueber-uns/presse/publikationen/details/geschaeftsmodelle-fuer-industrie-40-digitale-chancen-und-bedrohungen (25.11.2020).Google Scholar
Dorst, W., Falk, S., Hoffmann, M., Lehmann-Brauns, S., Löwen, U., Plass, Ch., Polenz, C., Posselt, Th., Riperda, Ch., Schmidt, F. and Unkelhäußer, L (2019), Digital business models for Industrie 4.0. Federal Ministry for Economic affairs and Energy (BMWI). Available at: https://www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/Digital-business-models.html (25.11.2020).Google Scholar
Drumm, O., Eckhardt, R., Fay, A., Gutermuth, G., Krumsiek, D., Löwen, U., Maikat, Th., Mersch, T., Schertl, A., Schwindler, Th., Schleipen, M. and Schröck, S. (2016), Statusreport durchgängiges Engineering in Industrie 4.0-Wertschöpfungsketten. Available at: https://www.vdi.de/ueber-uns/presse/publikationen/details/industrie-40-wertschoepfungsketten (25.11.2020)Google Scholar
Eigner, M. (2015), “How to Integrate MB(S)E and PLM”, In OMG Meeting 15.-19.06.2015, Berlin. Available at: https://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/berlin-15/special-events/mfg-presentations/eigner.pdf (10.03.2021)Google Scholar
Eigner, M., Dickopf, T., Apostolov, H. (2018), “Interdisciplinary Design Methods and Processes to Develop Cybertronic Products”, Konstruktion, Vol. 2018, No. 11/12, pp. 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberfellner, R., Fricke, E, Weck, O. and Vössner, S. (2012), Systems Engineering, Orell Füssli, Zürich.Google Scholar
Koren, Y. (2010), The Global Manufacturing Revolution: Product-Process-Business Integration and Reconfigurable Systems, John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meussen, B. (2017): Value Chains and Digitization of Product Development Processes. In: Proceedings of the 21. International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5: Design for X, Vancouver, Canada, 21.-25.08.2017, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, I. (2010), Business Model Generation, Wiley, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Signify, B.V. (Ed.) (2020), UID8460/10 ZGP Switch Dim 4B. Available at: https://www.lighting.philips.com/main/prof/lighting-controls/indoor-accessories/indoor-accessories/913700364103 _EU/product (25.11.2020)Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (2019a), VDI 2221 Part 1: Design of technical products and systems - Model of product design, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (2019b), VDI 2221 Part 2: Design of technical products and systems - Configuration of individual product design processes, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Weilkiens, Tim (2014), Systems Engineering mit SysML/UML, dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar