Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T15:52:56.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A MODEL OF CREATIVE HERITAGE FOR INDUSTRY: DESIGNING NEW RULES WHILE PRESERVING THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF RULES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Honorine Harlé ,
Pascal Le Masson  and
Benoit Weil
Honorine Harlé*
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech
Pascal Le Masson
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech
Benoit Weil
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech
*
Harlé, Honorine, MINES ParisTech, Centre de Gestion Scientifique, France, honorine.harle@mines-paristech.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In industry, there is at once a strong need for innovation and a need to preserve the existing system of production. Thus, although the literature insists on the necessity of the current change toward Industry 4.0, how to implement it remains problematic because the preservation of the factory is at stake. Moreover, the question of the evolution of the system depends on its innovative capability, but it is difficult to understand how a new rule can be designed and implemented in a factory. This tension between preservation and innovation is often explained in the literature as a process of creative destruction. Looking at the problem from another perspective, this article models the factory as a site of creative heritage, enabling creation within tradition, i.e., creating new rules while preserving the system of rules. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the model. The paper shows that design in the factory relies on the ability to validate solutions. To do so, the design process can explore and give new meaning to the existing rules. The role of innovation management is to choose the degree of revision of the rules and to make it possible.

Keywords

Industry 4.0Design theoryInnovation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 141 - 150
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aghion, P, Bergeaud, A, Boppart, T., Klenow, PJ, Li, H. (2019) Missing growth from creative destruction. Am. Econ Rev 109:2795–2822. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aheleroff, S, Philip, R, Zhong, RY, Xu, X (2019). The degree of mass personalisation under Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 81:1394–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert-Tarby, C, Escobar, OR, Rayna, T (2018). The impact of technological change on employment: The case of press digitisation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 128:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocal, F, González, C, Komljenovic, D, Katina, PF, Sebastián, MA (2019) Emerging risk management in Industry 4.0: An approach to improve organizational and human performance in the complex systems. Complexity 2019:e2089763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2089763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, BG, Duda, RO (1983) Principles of rule-based expert systems. In: Yovits, MC (ed) Advances in Computers. Elsevier, pp. 163–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60129-1Google Scholar
Carvajal, Perez D, Masson, PL, Weil, B (2018) Managing Dom Pérignon's creative heritage: Modelling and organising the transmission of knowledge for generativity. Université Paris Sciences et Lettres.Google Scholar
Christensen, CM, McDonald, R, Altman, EJ, Palmer, JE (2018) Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. J Manag Stud 55:1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coccia, M (2017) Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 29:1048–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culot, G, Nassimbeni, G, Orzes, G, Sartor, M (2020) Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. Int J Prod Econ 226:107617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, RD, Dutton, JE (1986) The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Manag Sci 32:1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchuel, A, Le Masson, P, Reich, Y, Subrahmanian, E (2018) Design theory: A foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering. Res Eng Des 29:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0275-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchuel, A, Le Masson, P, Reich, Y, Weil, B (2011) A systematic approach of design theories using generativeness and robustness. In: DS 68-2: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED 11), Impacting society through engineering design, Vol. 2: Design theory and research methodology, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A, Masson, PL, Weil, B, Carvajal-Perez, D (2019) Innovative design within tradition: Injecting topos structures in C-K theory to model culinary creation heritage. Proc Des Soc Int Conf Eng Des 1:1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecklau, F, Galeitzke, M, Flachs, S, Kohl, H (2016) Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 54:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervas-Oliver, JL, Sempere-Ripoll, F, Estelles-Miguel, S, Rojas-Alvarado, R (2019) Radical vs incremental innovation in Marshallian Industrial Districts in the Valencian Region: What prevails? Eur Plan Stud 27:1924–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, GW (2020). An analysis of the importance of both destruction and creation to economic growth. J Monet Econ 116:166–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K, Baek, C, Lee, JD (2018) Creative destruction of the sharing economy in action: The case of Uber. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract 110:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, WC, Mauborgne, R (2019) Nondisruptive creation: Rethinking innovation and growth. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 60:46–55.Google Scholar
Liu, B, De Giovanni, P (2019). Green process innovation through Industry 4.0 technologies and supply chain coordination. Ann Oper Res 1–36.Google Scholar
Lu, Y (2017) Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005Google Scholar
Martinuzzi, A, Blok, V, Brem, A, Stahl, B, Schönherr, N (2018) Responsible research and innovation in industry—Challenges, insights and perspectives. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, S (2016) Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies 6:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, JA (2013) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwalbe, U (2018) Schneider Henrique: Creative destruction and the sharing economy: Uber as disruptive innovation. J Econ 124:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0589-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoben, KD, Wiesner, S, Wuest, T (2017) “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing – A review of research issues and application examples. Int J Automation Tech 11:4–16. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberius, V, Schwarzer, H, Roig-Dobón, S (2020) Radical innovations: Between established knowledge and future research opportunities. J Innov Knowl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, W, Hardy, JH, Ebersole, CR, Leavitt, K, Viganola, D, Clemente, EG, Gordon, M, Dreber, A, Johannesson, M, Pfeiffer, T, Uhlmann, EL (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 161:291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veile, JW, Kiel, D, Müller, JM, Voigt, KI (2019) Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry. J Manuf Tech Manag 31:977–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwani, RD (2020) Gales, streams, and multipliers: Conceptual metaphors and theory development in business history. Enterp Soc 21:320–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2019.56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, J, Tang, S, Shu, Z, Li, D, Wang, S, Imran, M, Vasilakos, AV (2016) Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sens J 16:7373–7380.Google Scholar
Wichmann, RL, Eisenbart, B, Gericke, K (2019) The direction of industry: A literature review on Industry 4.0. Proc Des Soc Int Conf Eng Des 1:2129–2138. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, JL, Sharif, N (2020) From creative destruction to creative appropriation: A comprehensive framework. Res Policy 49:104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104060aCrossRefGoogle Scholar