No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE ADOPTION OF VIRTUAL TESTING
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This research aimed to gain insight into current practices and challenges with respect to the adoption of virtual testing and integration with physical testing in product development processes. A focused workshop investigated industrial perspectives on adopting virtual testing and current challenges. This paper reports the findings from the workshop in which representatives from a range of industries explored how virtual testing is used to support physical testing in their different contexts. This paper discusses the current challenges industries face in adopting virtual testing and changing role of physical testing, with reference to recent literature on physical and virtual testing and supported by an earlier empirical case study. This paper reports areas where more research is needed to support industries in overcoming these challenges.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bauer, B., Ayache, M., Mulhem, S., Nitzan, M., Athavaleet, J. al. (2022) “On the Dependability Lifecycle of Electrical/Electronic Product Development: The Dual-Cone V-Model” Computer, Vol: 55 No: 9, pp. 99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camburn, B., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2017) “Design prototyping methods: State of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines”. Design Science, Vol. 3, e13, http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donà, R. and Ciuffo, B. (2022) “Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Systems. A Survey on Validation Methods”, IEEE Access, Vol: 10, pp. 24349–24367, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3153722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, M., Engel, A. and Shachar, S. (2007) “SysTest: Improving the verification, validation, and testing process-Assessing six industrial pilot projects”, Systems Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 323–347, https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Government (2021) Industrial decarbonisation strategy. Retrieved 31/03/2022, 2021, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/970229/Industrial_Decarbonisation_Strategy_March_2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Huizinga, F., Ostaijen, R.V., Slingeland, A.V.O. (2002) “A practical approach to virtual testing in automotive engineering”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. and Simon, D. L. (2002) “Spotlight Innovation, Not Just Evaluation”, Concept to Reality Magazine, Altair Engineering Limited, Spring 2002Google Scholar
Khalaf, F. (2006) “An engineered testing strategy: part I: enhanced balance between analytic and hardware”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol: 3 No: 3, pp. 404–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharul, R., Balakrishnan, S., Karedla, D., and You, S. S. (2010) “Virtual Testing and Correlation for a Motorcycle Design”, SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, Vol: 3, No. 1, pp. 541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, C.K., Chen, C.H., and Zhong, R. Y. (2021) “A review of digital twin in product design and development”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol: 48, 101297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamasioulas, A., Mourtzis, D. and Chryssolouris, G. (2020) “A manufacturing innovation overview: concepts, models and metrics”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 33 No. 8, pp. 769–791, http://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1780317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maropoulos, P.G. and Ceglarek, D. (2010) “Design verification and validation in product lifecycle”. CIRP Annals, Vol:59 No:1, pp. 740–759, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauery, T., Alonso, J., Cary, A., Lee, V., Malecki, R., Mavriplis, D., Medic, G., Schaefer, J. and Slotnick, J. (2021). A guide for aircraft certification by analysis, NASA, NASA/CR-20210015404Google Scholar
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Mishra, R., Singh, R. and Govindan, K. (2022), “Net-zero economy research in the field of supply chain management: a systematic literature review and future research agenda”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2022-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, P. (2001) Test engineering: a concise guide to cost-effective design, development and manufacture. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Ostergaard, M.G., Ibbotson, A.R., Roux, O.L., and Prior, A.M. (2011) “Virtual testing of aircraft structures”. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, Vol: 1 No: 1-4, article 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-011-0004-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C. (2021) “SpaceX starship lands on Earth, but manned missions to Mars will require more”, Engineering Vol: 7 No: 10, pp. 1345–1347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, O., Iatsyshyn, A., Sokolov, D., Dement, M., Neklonskyi, I., Yelizarov, A. (2021), “Application of Virtual and Augmented Reality at Nuclear Power Plants”, In: Zaporozhets, A., Artemchuk, V. (eds) Systems, Decision and Control in Energy II. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 346. Springer, Cham, pp. 243–260, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69189-9_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remedia, M., Aglietti, G.S., Appolloni, M., Cozzani, A. and Kiley, A. (2017) “An enhanced methodology for spacecraft correlation activity using virtual testing tools”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol: 409, pp. 180–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman., D. (ed) (1997) Qualitative research., theory method and practice, Sage Publications IncGoogle Scholar
Stark., J. (2020) Product lifecycle management, 4th Edition. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Tahera, K. (2014) The role of testing in engineering product development processes. PhD Thesis, The Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
Tahera, K., Wynn, D.C., Earl, C., and Eckert, C. (2019) “Testing in the incremental design and development of complex products”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 30, pp. 291–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0295-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H. and Sui, F. (2018) “Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol: 94, pp. 3563–3576, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorriassatine, F., Wykes, C., Parkin, R. and Gindy, N. (2003) “A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development”, In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol: 217 No: 4, pp. 513–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access