Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:14:35.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE IMPORTANCE OF GENDER-AWARE DESIGN IN DIGITAL HEALTH WEARABLES: A CO-DESIGN STUDY FOSTERING SUN PROTECTION BEHAVIOUR IN YOUNG MEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Bahar Khayamian Esfahani
Bahar Khayamian Esfahani*
Affiliation:
University of East London
*
Khayamian Esfahani, Bahar, University of East London Engineering United Kingdom b.khayamian@gmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The rise in the number of people living with long-term conditions is precipitating a shift towards the development of wearable technologies that can monitor our health remotely. This shift makes it possible to rethink the healthcare structure towards awareness and proactive prevention instead of treatment through empowering users, e.g. patients for self-management of their health. In a sector towards individual specialization and relying on personal healthcare management, design has a key role in user participation and engagement. This paper reports a co-design study that empowered the participants as designers to design human-centred interventions that foster sun protection behaviour in young men. The findings from this study show the following: 1) sun protection concepts to enhance young men's engagement in sun protection behaviour, 2) the integration of gender-aware design in digital health wearables contributes towards better user engagement in wearable technologies of the future.

Keywords

User centred designParticipatory designDesign process
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 3031 - 3040
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Cancer Research UK. (2014), “Skin cancer incidence statistics”, available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/skin-cancer/incidence (accessed 9 November 2017).Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P.M. and Bowen, S.J. (2006), “Designer's Use of the Artefact in Human- centred Design”, Designing Accessible Technology, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
Connell, R. (1987), Gender and Power:Society, the Person and Sexual Politics, Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cooper, E, Tsekleves, E. (2017), Design for Health, available at: http://radar.gsa.ac.uk/5329/1/9781472457424_chapter17Macdonald.pdf (accessed 26 November 2018).Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2007), NHS Cancer Reform Strategy 2007, Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2008.01.014.Google Scholar
Ehrnberger, K., Räsänen, M. and IIstedt, S. (2012), “Visualising Gender Norms in Design: Meet the Mega Hurricane Mixer and the Drill Dolphia”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 6 No. 3, p. 17.Google Scholar
Giacomin, J. (2012), “Microsoft Word - What is Human Centred Design - What is Human Centred Design.pdf”, No. Krippendorff 1989, available at: http://hcdi.brunel.ac.uk/files/WhatisHumanCentredDesign.pdf.Google Scholar
Giacomin, J. (2014), “What is human centred design?”, Design Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.A., Henderson, M., Frank, J.W. and Haw, S.J. (2012), “An overview of prevention of multiple risk behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood”, Journal of Public Health, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr113.Google Scholar
Taylor, Karen. (2015), The Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions, available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/deloitte-uk-connected-health.pdf (accessed 20 November 2018).Google Scholar
Moss, G. (2009), Gender, Design and Marketing: How Gender Drives Our Perception of Design and Marketing, Gower.Google Scholar
NHS. (2018), “Technology Enabled Care Services (TECS)”, available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/tecs/ (accessed 26 November 2020).Google Scholar
NICE. (2012), “National Skin Cancer Campaigns”, available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph32/documents/expert-paper-2-national-campaigns-uk-and-worldwide-2 (accessed 16 July 2018).Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2013), The Design of Everyday Things, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, Vol. 16, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20127.Google Scholar
Peacey, V., Steptoe, A., Sanderman, R. and Wardle, J. (2006), “Ten-year changes in sun protection behaviors and beliefs of young adults in 13 European countries”, Preventive Medicine, Academic Press, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 460–465.Google Scholar
Reichrath, J. (2014), Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer, Springer New York, New York, NY, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0437-2.Google ScholarPubMed
Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (2013), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Routledge.Google Scholar
Spinoff.Nasa. (2014), “Activity Monitors Help Users Get Optimum Sun Exposure”.Google Scholar
Thuemmler, C. (2017), “The case for health 4.0”, Health 4.0: How Virtualization and Big Data Are Revolutionizing Healthcare, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, F.S. (2009), Bringing the Everyday Life of People into Design, Fac Industrial Design Dep Design Conceptualization and Communication, Vol. Ph.D., available at: https://doi.org/978-90-9024244-6.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. (1985), “The Social Shaping of Technology edited by MacKenzie, Donald and Wajcman, Judy (Open University Press, Milton Keynesand Philadelphia, 1985) pp. vii + 237, ISBN 0-335-15027-6”, Prometheus, Taylor & Francis Group, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 466–469.Google Scholar