Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:45:01.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Future-robust product design – validating influencing factors on upgradeable mechatronic systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Maximilian Kuebler ,
Carolin Lange ,
Bastian Glasmacher ,
Tobias Düser  and
Albert Albers
Maximilian Kuebler*
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Carolin Lange
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Bastian Glasmacher
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Tobias Düser
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
maximilian.kuebler@kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines upgradability through modular product design, aiming to extend lifecycles and promote cross-generational use. It builds up on a preceding work, a systematic literature- review identifying four fields of action in future-robust product design. The paper itself contains an in-depth interview study with 17 experts from industry and research to validate and expand the literature-based fields of action. The results provide insights into the application and employment of future-robust product design, with a focus on adaptable product architectures.

Keywords

upgradedesign methodologydesign researchsustainable designmodularisation
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 633 - 642
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A., Düser, T., Kuebler, M., Schwarz, S.E., Lickefett, M.S., Pfaff, F. and Thümmel, C. (2023), “Upgradeable Mechatronic Systems – Definition and Model of Upgrades in the Context of the Model of SGE - System Generation Engineering”, Proceedings of the FISITA 2023 World Congress, FISITA, Bishop's Stortford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. and Gausemeier, J. (2012), “Von der fachdisziplinorientierten Produktentwicklung zur Vorausschauenden und Systemorientierten Produktentstehung”, in Anderl, R., Eigner, M., Sendler, U. and Stark, R. (Eds.), Smart Engineering, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A. and Rapp, S. (2022), “Model of SGE: System Generation Engineering as Basis for Structured Planning and Management of Development”, in Krause, D. and Heyden, E. (Eds.), Design Methodology for Future Products, Springer International Publishing, pp. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, F., Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V. and Wessels, H. (2019), “The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 1693–1702.Google Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 118–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierici, E. and Copani, G. (2016), “Remanufacturing with Upgrade PSS for New Sustainable Business Models”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 47, pp. 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1993), “Screening new products for potential winners”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ElMaraghy, H., Schuh, G., ElMaraghy, W., Piller, F., Schönsleben, P., Tseng, M. and Bernard, A. (2013), “Product variety management”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M. and Hultink, E.J. (2017), “The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 143, pp. 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. (2010), Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, Lehrbuch, 4. Auflage, VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, E., Fuchs, C., Hamraz, B., Windheim, M. and Krause, D. (2021), “Design for futire variety to enable long-term benefits of modular product families”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. (2000), “Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A. and Wuest, T. (2018), “Towards a framework to design upgradable product service systems”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 78, pp. 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A. and Wuest, T. (2019), “Upgradable Product-Service Systems: Implications for Business Model Components”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 80, pp. 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D. and Gebhardt, N. (2018), Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuebler, M., Beck, F., Glasmacher, B., Rapp, S. and Albers, A. (2023), “Robust product design – Influencing factors on upgradeable modular products”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 3, pp. 3115–3124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayring, P. (2015), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, Ipdated Edition, Beltz, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Mörtl, M. (2003), “Design for Upgrading" of machines and production processes: A guideline based on actual demands of industry and sustainable design”, DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Kuhn, M., Keuper, A., Patzwald, M., Schenk, L., Guo, D., Feucht, M., Kantelberg, J., Rossmair, G., Schroth, H., Viethen, U. and Zeller, P. (2023), New Modularity and Technology Roadmapping.Google Scholar
Steffen, A. and Doppler, S. (2019), Einführung in die Qualitative Marktforschung, Springer, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thümmel, C., Schlegel, M., Kuebler, M., Schwarz, S.E., Siebe, A., Albers, Albert, Nolte, B., Sommer, S. and Vietor, T. (2022), “Foresight in Product Development - A Review on Existing Understandings and Approaches”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM Society International, Michigan, pp. 261–271.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. (1995), “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm”, Research Policy, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, Y., Kondoh, S., Shimomura, Y. and Tomiyama, T. (2005), “Development of design methodology for upgradable products based on function–behavior–state modeling”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezzoli, C. and Manzini, E. (2008), Design for Environmental Sustainability, Springer London, London.Google Scholar
Vogel, P. and Hultin, G. (2018), “Introduction: Digitalization and Why Leaders Need to Take It Seriously”, in Thomson, P., Johnson, M. and Devlin, J.M. (Eds.), Conquering Digital Overload, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63799-0_1Google Scholar