Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T01:37:36.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges for the Consideration of Ergonomics in Product Development in the Swedish Automotive Industry – An Interview Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

E. Perez Luque ,
E. Brolin ,
D. Högberg  and
M. Lamb
E. Perez Luque*
Affiliation:
University of Skövde, Sweden
E. Brolin
Affiliation:
University of Skövde, Sweden
D. Högberg
Affiliation:
University of Skövde, Sweden
M. Lamb
Affiliation:
University of Skövde, Sweden
*
estela.perez.luque@his.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents an interview study aiming to understand the state of the art of how ergonomics designers work in the vehicle development process within the Swedish automotive industry. Ten ergonomic designers from seven different companies participated in the interview study. Results report the ergonomics designers' objectives, workflow, tools, challenges, and ideal work performance tool. We identify four main gaps and research directions that can enhance the current challenges: human behavior predictions, simulation tool usability, ergonomics evaluations, and integration between systems.

Keywords

vehicleergonomicshuman-centred designsimulation-based designdigital human modelling
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2165 - 2174
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

ADOPTIVE (2021) Vehicle andSAFER - Traffic Safety Centre at Chalmers. Available at: https://www.saferresearch.com/projects/adoptive (Accessed: 9 February 2022).Google Scholar
Bhise, V.D. (2016) Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process. CRC Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b11237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhofer, H., Jänsch, J. and Kloberdanz, H. (2005) ‘An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods andmethodology in industry’, in Proceedings ICED 05. the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 276–277.Google Scholar
Broberg, O. (1997) ‘Integrating ergonomics into the product development process’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(4), pp. 317–327. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00041-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, K.B. and Wheelwright, S.C. (1993) Managing new product and process development: text and cases. Free Press.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2021) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. John Wiley&Sons.Google Scholar
Demirel, H.O., Ahmed, S. and Duffy, V.G. (2021) ‘Digital Human Modeling: A Review and Reappraisal of Origins, Present, and Expected Future Methods for Representing Humans Computationally’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1976507.Google Scholar
Eisenmann, M. and Matthiesen, S. (2020) ‘Identifying reasons for a lack of method application in the engineering design practice - An interview study’, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, pp. 2495–2504. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.261.Google Scholar
Falck, A.-C. and Rosenqvist, M. (2012) ‘What are the obstacles and needs of proactive ergonomics measures at early product development stages? – An interview study in five Swedish companies’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(5), pp. 406–415. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, C., Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2008) ‘METHODS IN PRACTICE – A STUDY ON REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER OF DESIGN METHODS’, DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 369–376.Google Scholar
Högberg, D. (2009) ‘Digital human modelling for user-centred vehicle design and anthropometric analysis’, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 51(3/4), p. 306. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2009.027959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO 11064-7 (2006) Ergonomic design of control centres — Part 7: Principles for the evaluation of control centres. ISO 11064-7. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Lämkull, D. and Zdrodowski, M. (2020) ‘The Need for Faster and More Consistent Digital Human Modeling Software Tools’, IOS Press, p. 12. https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ATDE200037.Google Scholar
Littig, B. (2009) ‘Interviewing the Elite — Interviewing Experts: Is There a Difference?’, in Bogner, A., Littig, B., and Menz, W. (eds) Interviewing Experts. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 98–113. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Made in Sweden 2030 (2017). Available at: https://www.vinnova.se/m/strategiska-innovationsprogram/agendor/made-in-sweden-2030---produktion/ (Accessed: 15 February 2022).Google Scholar
Martin, J.N. (1997) Systems Engineering Guidebook: A Process for Developing Systems and Products, Routledge & CRC Press.Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2014) Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, p. 144.Google Scholar
Meuser, M. and Nagel, U. (2009) ‘The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production’, in Bogner, A., Littig, B., and Menz, W. (eds) Interviewing Experts. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 17–42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOSIM (2018). Available at: https://mosim.eu/ (Accessed: 9 February 2022).Google Scholar
Ranger, F., Vezeau, S. and Lortie, M. (2018) ‘Traditional product representations and new digital tools in the dimensioning activity: a designers’ point of view on difficulties and needs’, The Design Journal, 21(5), pp. 707–730. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1494795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scataglini, S. and Paul, G. (2019) DHM and Posturography.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröppel, T., Endress, F., Köpken, I., Miehling, J. and Wartzack, S. (2021) ‘Structured ergonomic guidance in early design phases by analysing the user-product interaction’, Ergonomics, 64(11), pp. 1491–1506. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1925352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SVE (2020) University of Skövde - Synergy Virtual Ergonomics. Available at: https://www.his.se/en/research/virtual-engineering/user-centred-product-design/virtual-ergonomics/ (Accessed: 9 February 2022).Google Scholar
Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P.W. and Carey, T. (2002) ‘A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice’, (1), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, W., Fan, X. and Zhang, Y. (2019) ‘Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry’, Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 1(6), pp. 558–579. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.005.Google Scholar